SPMD vs. SPDW
SPMD (SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF) and SPDW (SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPMD is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index, while SPDW is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the S&P Developed Ex-U.S. BMI Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPMD returned 11.78%/yr vs 10.64%/yr for SPDW. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPMD charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPDW.
Performance
SPMD vs. SPDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SPMD having a 15.51% return and SPDW slightly lower at 14.86%. Over the past 10 years, SPMD has outperformed SPDW with an annualized return of 11.78%, while SPDW has yielded a comparatively lower 10.64% annualized return.
SPMD
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 3.56%
- YTD
- 15.51%
- 6M
- 14.03%
- 1Y
- 27.96%
- 3Y*
- 15.42%
- 5Y*
- 8.28%
- 10Y*
- 11.78%
SPDW
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 1.53%
- YTD
- 14.86%
- 6M
- 16.65%
- 1Y
- 31.27%
- 3Y*
- 19.01%
- 5Y*
- 9.30%
- 10Y*
- 10.64%
SPMD vs. SPDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMD SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF | 15.51% | 7.44% | 13.91% | 16.48% | -13.13% | 24.76% | 13.46% | 25.19% | -10.34% | 15.12% |
SPDW SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF | 14.86% | 34.75% | 3.55% | 17.81% | -15.98% | 11.45% | 9.90% | 22.41% | -14.22% | 25.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPMD and SPDW is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2007 | 0.73 |
The correlation between SPMD and SPDW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPMD vs. SPDW — Risk / Return Rank
SPMD
SPDW
SPMD vs. SPDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF (SPMD) and SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPMD | SPDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.33 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.95 | 2.58 | +0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.81 | 9.95 | +0.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPMD vs. SPDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPMD drawdown since its inception was -57.62%, roughly equal to the maximum SPDW drawdown of -60.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMD and SPDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPMD | SPDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.62% | -60.02% | +2.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.86% | -11.55% | +2.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.08% | -13.53% | -10.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.08% | -30.21% | +6.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.86% | -34.98% | -6.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.99% | +0.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.11% | -12.89% | +4.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.41% | 2.99% | -0.58% |
Volatility
SPMD vs. SPDW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF (SPMD) is 5.07%, while SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) has a volatility of 6.86%. This indicates that SPMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPMD | SPDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.07% | 6.86% | -1.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.77% | 14.23% | -2.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.91% | 16.51% | -0.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.75% | 16.66% | +3.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.20% | 17.31% | +3.89% |
SPMD vs. SPDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPMD has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SPDW's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPMD vs. SPDW - Dividend Comparison
SPMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than SPDW's 2.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPDW SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF | 2.87% | 3.30% | 3.19% | 2.75% | 3.12% | 3.04% | 1.87% | 3.13% | 3.08% | 1.86% | 3.11% | 2.78% |
SPMD SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF | 1.21% | 1.39% | 1.42% | 1.47% | 1.64% | 1.24% | 1.30% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 1.97% | 2.13% | 5.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPMD and SPDW have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPDW has higher volatility (6.86%) compared to SPMD (5.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPMD dropped -57.62% vs SPDW's -60.02%.
On 10-year performance, SPMD leads with 11.78% vs 10.64% for SPDW. On fees, SPDW is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPMD has been the lower-risk option at 5.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPMD has performed better with a 11.78% return vs 10.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPDW is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for SPMD.
SPDW has the higher dividend yield at 2.87%, compared with 1.21% for SPMD.
SPMD is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while SPDW is Foreign Large Cap Equities. SPMD tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index, while SPDW tracks S&P Developed Ex-U.S. BMI Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPMD and 0.04% for SPDW.
SPDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPMD and SPDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer