PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPLV vs. USMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPLV vs. USMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) and iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPLV achieves a 2.41% return, which is significantly higher than USMV's 1.55% return. Over the past 10 years, SPLV has underperformed USMV with an annualized return of 8.03%, while USMV has yielded a comparatively higher 9.75% annualized return.


SPLV

1D
-1.36%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
2.41%
6M
3.70%
1Y
1.54%
3Y*
7.70%
5Y*
5.72%
10Y*
8.03%

USMV

1D
-0.43%
1M
1.28%
YTD
1.55%
6M
2.27%
1Y
3.18%
3Y*
11.35%
5Y*
7.21%
10Y*
9.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPLV vs. USMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPLV
Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF
2.41%4.10%13.93%0.53%-4.88%24.13%-1.39%27.87%-0.19%17.32%
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
1.55%7.65%15.74%10.33%-9.43%20.85%5.64%27.69%1.33%18.91%

Correlation

The correlation between SPLV and USMV is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011

0.91

The correlation between SPLV and USMV shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPLV vs. USMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPLV
USMV

Utilities

26.8%
7.5%

Financial Services

16.6%
12.4%

Real Estate

14.8%
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

10.8%
10.0%

Industrials

10.1%
5.7%

Healthcare

6.8%
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
5.7%

Technology

4.6%
30.8%

Basic Materials

2.0%
2.2%

Energy

0.9%
3.6%

Communication Services

0.9%
5.9%

Utilities

SPLV
26.8%
USMV
7.5%

Financial Services

SPLV
16.6%
USMV
12.4%

Real Estate

SPLV
14.8%
USMV
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

SPLV
10.8%
USMV
10.0%

Industrials

SPLV
10.1%
USMV
5.7%

Healthcare

SPLV
6.8%
USMV
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SPLV
5.7%
USMV
5.7%

Technology

SPLV
4.6%
USMV
30.8%

Basic Materials

SPLV
2.0%
USMV
2.2%

Energy

SPLV
0.9%
USMV
3.6%

Communication Services

SPLV
0.9%
USMV
5.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPLV vs. USMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPLV
SPLV Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
SPLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPLV Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
SPLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPLV Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

USMV
USMV Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
USMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
USMV Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
USMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
USMV Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPLV vs. USMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) and iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPLVUSMVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.07

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.21

0.49

-0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.50

1.64

-1.14

SPLV vs. USMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPLV Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the USMV Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPLV and USMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPLVUSMVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

0.37

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.59

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.67

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.86

-0.18

Drawdowns

SPLV vs. USMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPLV drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, which is greater than USMV's maximum drawdown of -33.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPLV and USMV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPLVUSMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.26%

-33.10%

-3.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.41%

-6.46%

-0.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.64%

-9.36%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.26%

-17.93%

+0.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.26%

-33.10%

-3.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.91%

-2.24%

-3.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.55%

-2.88%

-0.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

1.94%

+1.17%

Volatility

SPLV vs. USMV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) has a higher volatility of 3.74% compared to iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) at 2.65%. This indicates that SPLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPLVUSMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

2.65%

+1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.09%

6.02%

+1.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.01%

8.57%

+1.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.48%

12.36%

+0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.38%

14.51%

+0.87%

SPLV vs. USMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than USMV's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPLV vs. USMV - Dividend Comparison

SPLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, more than USMV's 1.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPLV
Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF
2.20%2.04%1.88%2.45%2.11%1.51%2.12%2.08%2.18%2.03%2.03%2.28%
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
1.54%1.49%1.67%1.82%1.62%1.26%1.81%1.88%2.12%1.77%2.22%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPLV and USMV have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPLV has higher volatility (3.74%) compared to USMV (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPLV dropped -36.26% vs USMV's -33.10%.

On 10-year performance, USMV leads with 9.75% vs 8.03% for SPLV. On fees, USMV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, USMV has performed better with a 9.75% return vs 8.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USMV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SPLV.

SPLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.20%, compared with 1.54% for USMV.

SPLV is categorized as S&P 500, while USMV is Large Cap Blend Equities. SPLV tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Index, while USMV tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SPLV and 0.15% for USMV.

USMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.37 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPLV and USMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer