PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USMV vs. SPMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USMV vs. SPMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) and Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF (SPMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


USMV

1D
0.29%
1M
-2.10%
YTD
1.14%
6M
0.51%
1Y
3.59%
3Y*
10.93%
5Y*
7.02%
10Y*
9.79%

SPMV

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USMV vs. SPMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
1.14%7.65%15.74%10.33%-9.43%20.85%5.64%27.69%1.33%6.69%
SPMV
Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF
0.87%11.69%18.78%10.28%-10.84%24.35%8.57%32.13%-6.28%7.84%

Correlation

The correlation between USMV and SPMV is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2017

0.83

Over the past year, the correlation between USMV and SPMV has dropped to 0.62 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

USMV vs. SPMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USMV
SPMV

Technology

33.9%
26.9%

Healthcare

12.6%
15.0%

Financial Services

11.7%
17.8%

Consumer Defensive

9.4%
10.7%

Utilities

6.9%
2.8%

Communication Services

6.2%
6.5%

Industrials

6.1%
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
6.6%

Energy

2.7%
4.8%

Real Estate

2.5%
0.2%

Basic Materials

2.4%
2.6%

Technology

USMV
33.9%
SPMV
26.9%

Healthcare

USMV
12.6%
SPMV
15.0%

Financial Services

USMV
11.7%
SPMV
17.8%

Consumer Defensive

USMV
9.4%
SPMV
10.7%

Utilities

USMV
6.9%
SPMV
2.8%

Communication Services

USMV
6.2%
SPMV
6.5%

Industrials

USMV
6.1%
SPMV
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

USMV
5.7%
SPMV
6.6%

Energy

USMV
2.7%
SPMV
4.8%

Real Estate

USMV
2.5%
SPMV
0.2%

Basic Materials

USMV
2.4%
SPMV
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USMV vs. SPMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USMV
USMV Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
USMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
USMV Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
USMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
USMV Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USMV vs. SPMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) and Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF (SPMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USMVSPMVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.82

USMV vs. SPMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USMV vs. SPMV - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USMVSPMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

Volatility

USMV vs. SPMV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USMVSPMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.51%

USMV vs. SPMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

USMV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMV's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

USMV vs. SPMV - Dividend Comparison

USMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, while SPMV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPMV
Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF
1.05%1.53%1.53%2.28%1.79%1.28%1.71%3.13%2.11%1.72%0.00%0.00%
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
1.53%1.49%1.67%1.82%1.62%1.26%1.81%1.88%2.12%1.77%2.22%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


USMV and SPMV have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPMV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPMV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for USMV.

USMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 1.05% for SPMV.

USMV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SPMV is S&P 500. USMV tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index, while SPMV tracks S&P 500 Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for USMV and 0.10% for SPMV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USMV and SPMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer