SPLV vs. SPYV
SPLV (Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF) and SPYV (SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF) are both S&P 500 funds - SPLV tracks the S&P 500 Low Volatility Index while SPYV tracks the S&P 500 Value. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPLV returned 8.01%/yr vs 11.90%/yr for SPYV. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPLV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYV.
Performance
SPLV vs. SPYV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPLV achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly lower than SPYV's 7.46% return. Over the past 10 years, SPLV has underperformed SPYV with an annualized return of 8.01%, while SPYV has yielded a comparatively higher 11.90% annualized return.
SPLV
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -2.50%
- YTD
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- 1Y
- -0.03%
- 3Y*
- 7.54%
- 5Y*
- 5.33%
- 10Y*
- 8.01%
SPYV
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 2.22%
- YTD
- 7.46%
- 6M
- 7.77%
- 1Y
- 21.26%
- 3Y*
- 15.72%
- 5Y*
- 10.68%
- 10Y*
- 11.90%
SPLV vs. SPYV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPLV Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF | 1.32% | 4.10% | 13.93% | 0.53% | -4.88% | 24.13% | -1.39% | 27.87% | -0.19% | 17.32% |
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 7.46% | 13.18% | 12.24% | 22.20% | -5.28% | 24.91% | 1.38% | 31.70% | -9.01% | 15.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPLV and SPYV is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2011 | 0.75 |
The correlation between SPLV and SPYV shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPLV vs. SPYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPLV
SPYV
Utilities
Financial Services
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
SPLV
SPYV
Financial Services
SPLV
SPYV
Real Estate
SPLV
SPYV
Consumer Defensive
SPLV
SPYV
Industrials
SPLV
SPYV
Healthcare
SPLV
SPYV
Consumer Cyclical
SPLV
SPYV
Technology
SPLV
SPYV
Basic Materials
SPLV
SPYV
Energy
SPLV
SPYV
Communication Services
SPLV
SPYV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPLV vs. SPYV — Risk / Return Rank
SPLV
SPYV
SPLV vs. SPYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPLV | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.39 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.00 | 3.43 | -3.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.01 | 13.16 | -13.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPLV | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 | 2.17 | -2.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.75 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.70 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.42 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
SPLV vs. SPYV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPLV drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, smaller than the maximum SPYV drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPLV and SPYV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPLV | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.26% | -58.45% | +22.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.41% | -6.22% | -1.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.64% | -17.54% | +7.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.26% | -17.89% | +0.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.26% | -36.89% | +0.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.91% | -0.57% | -6.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.55% | -8.72% | +5.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 1.62% | +1.43% |
Volatility
SPLV vs. SPYV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) has a higher volatility of 2.97% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) at 1.98%. This indicates that SPLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPLV | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | 1.98% | +0.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.78% | 7.04% | -0.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.78% | 9.84% | -0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.45% | 14.40% | -1.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.36% | 16.94% | -1.58% |
SPLV vs. SPYV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPLV vs. SPYV - Dividend Comparison
SPLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, more than SPYV's 1.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPLV Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF | 2.22% | 2.04% | 1.88% | 2.45% | 2.11% | 1.51% | 2.12% | 2.08% | 2.18% | 2.03% | 2.03% | 2.28% |
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 1.70% | 1.77% | 2.29% | 1.75% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 2.38% | 2.25% | 2.97% | 2.77% | 2.39% | 2.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPLV and SPYV have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPLV has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to SPYV (1.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPLV dropped -36.26% vs SPYV's -58.45%.
On 10-year performance, SPYV leads with 11.90% vs 8.01% for SPLV. On fees, SPYV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYV has been the lower-risk option at 1.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPYV has performed better with a 11.90% return vs 8.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SPLV.
SPLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.22%, compared with 1.70% for SPYV.
SPLV tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Index, while SPYV tracks S&P 500 Value. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SPLV and 0.04% for SPYV.
SPYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPLV and SPYV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer