SPLV vs. RPG
SPLV (Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF) and RPG (Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPLV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Low Volatility Index, while RPG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPLV returned 8.38%/yr vs 15.14%/yr for RPG. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPLV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RPG.
Performance
SPLV vs. RPG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPLV achieves a 5.06% return, which is significantly lower than RPG's 30.31% return. Over the past 10 years, SPLV has underperformed RPG with an annualized return of 8.38%, while RPG has yielded a comparatively higher 15.14% annualized return.
SPLV
- 1D
- 1.32%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 5.06%
- 6M
- 4.84%
- 1Y
- 4.45%
- 3Y*
- 8.50%
- 5Y*
- 6.37%
- 10Y*
- 8.38%
RPG
- 1D
- -4.60%
- 1M
- 5.48%
- YTD
- 30.31%
- 6M
- 27.62%
- 1Y
- 38.51%
- 3Y*
- 27.72%
- 5Y*
- 11.59%
- 10Y*
- 15.14%
SPLV vs. RPG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPLV Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF | 5.06% | 4.10% | 13.93% | 0.53% | -4.88% | 24.13% | -1.39% | 27.87% | -0.19% | 17.32% |
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF | 30.31% | 13.41% | 28.23% | 8.04% | -27.55% | 29.40% | 29.34% | 28.34% | -4.53% | 26.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPLV and RPG is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2011 | 0.60 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SPLV and RPG has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPLV vs. RPG — Risk / Return Rank
SPLV
RPG
SPLV vs. RPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) and Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPLV | RPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.31 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.60 | 3.49 | -2.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.39 | 13.16 | -11.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPLV vs. RPG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPLV drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, smaller than the maximum RPG drawdown of -53.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPLV and RPG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPLV | RPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.26% | -53.27% | +17.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.41% | -11.08% | +3.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.64% | -24.75% | +15.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.26% | -35.59% | +18.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.26% | -36.58% | +0.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.47% | -4.60% | +1.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.55% | -8.83% | +5.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.20% | 2.93% | +0.27% |
Volatility
SPLV vs. RPG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) is 4.26%, while Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) has a volatility of 11.10%. This indicates that SPLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RPG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPLV | RPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.26% | 11.10% | -6.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.38% | 19.02% | -11.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.28% | 22.09% | -11.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.50% | 23.86% | -11.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.39% | 22.90% | -7.51% |
SPLV vs. RPG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than RPG's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPLV vs. RPG - Dividend Comparison
SPLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, more than RPG's 0.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF | 0.15% | 0.24% | 0.25% | 1.44% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.46% | 0.83% | 0.47% | 0.56% | 0.43% | 0.73% |
SPLV Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF | 2.16% | 2.04% | 1.88% | 2.45% | 2.11% | 1.51% | 2.12% | 2.08% | 2.18% | 2.03% | 2.03% | 2.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPLV and RPG have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RPG has higher volatility (11.10%) compared to SPLV (4.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPLV dropped -36.26% vs RPG's -53.27%.
On 10-year performance, RPG leads with 15.14% vs 8.38% for SPLV. On fees, SPLV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, SPLV has been the lower-risk option at 4.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RPG has performed better with a 15.14% return vs 8.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPLV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RPG.
SPLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.16%, compared with 0.15% for RPG.
SPLV is categorized as S&P 500, while RPG is Large Cap Growth Equities. SPLV tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Index, while RPG tracks S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SPLV and 0.35% for RPG.
RPG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPLV and RPG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer