SPLV vs. RODM
SPLV (Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF) and RODM (Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPLV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Low Volatility Index, while RODM is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPLV returned 8.33%/yr vs 9.24%/yr for RODM. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPLV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for RODM.
Performance
SPLV vs. RODM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPLV achieves a 4.85% return, which is significantly lower than RODM's 11.64% return. Over the past 10 years, SPLV has underperformed RODM with an annualized return of 8.33%, while RODM has yielded a comparatively higher 9.24% annualized return.
SPLV
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 2.76%
- YTD
- 4.85%
- 6M
- 4.17%
- 1Y
- 4.71%
- 3Y*
- 8.01%
- 5Y*
- 6.29%
- 10Y*
- 8.33%
RODM
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 11.64%
- 6M
- 12.64%
- 1Y
- 25.47%
- 3Y*
- 19.57%
- 5Y*
- 9.73%
- 10Y*
- 9.24%
SPLV vs. RODM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPLV Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF | 4.85% | 4.10% | 13.93% | 0.53% | -4.88% | 24.13% | -1.39% | 27.87% | -0.19% | 17.32% |
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 11.64% | 34.42% | 8.02% | 15.76% | -14.54% | 11.11% | -0.62% | 17.15% | -9.97% | 25.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPLV and RODM is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2015 | 0.53 |
The correlation between SPLV and RODM shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.57 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPLV vs. RODM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPLV
RODM
Utilities
Financial Services
Real Estate
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Technology
Communication Services
Utilities
SPLV
RODM
Financial Services
SPLV
RODM
Real Estate
SPLV
RODM
Industrials
SPLV
RODM
Consumer Defensive
SPLV
RODM
Healthcare
SPLV
RODM
Consumer Cyclical
SPLV
RODM
Energy
SPLV
RODM
Basic Materials
SPLV
RODM
Technology
SPLV
RODM
Communication Services
SPLV
RODM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPLV vs. RODM — Risk / Return Rank
SPLV
RODM
SPLV vs. RODM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPLV | RODM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.42 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.64 | 3.60 | -2.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.50 | 14.32 | -12.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPLV vs. RODM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPLV drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, roughly equal to the maximum RODM drawdown of -35.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPLV and RODM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPLV | RODM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.26% | -35.98% | -0.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.41% | -7.10% | -0.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.64% | -10.58% | +0.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.26% | -28.85% | +11.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.26% | -35.98% | -0.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.66% | -0.84% | -2.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.55% | -6.36% | +2.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.15% | 1.78% | +1.37% |
Volatility
SPLV vs. RODM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) has a higher volatility of 4.03% compared to Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) at 3.58%. This indicates that SPLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RODM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPLV | RODM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.03% | 3.58% | +0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.20% | 8.77% | -1.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.08% | 11.01% | -0.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.51% | 13.48% | -0.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.38% | 15.22% | +0.16% |
SPLV vs. RODM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than RODM's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPLV vs. RODM - Dividend Comparison
SPLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, less than RODM's 2.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 2.78% | 3.11% | 4.09% | 4.42% | 3.81% | 4.41% | 2.82% | 2.82% | 2.03% | 2.24% | 3.19% | 2.60% |
SPLV Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF | 2.15% | 2.04% | 1.88% | 2.45% | 2.11% | 1.51% | 2.12% | 2.08% | 2.18% | 2.03% | 2.03% | 2.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPLV and RODM have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPLV has higher volatility (4.03%) compared to RODM (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPLV dropped -36.26% vs RODM's -35.98%.
On 10-year performance, RODM leads with 9.24% vs 8.33% for SPLV. On fees, SPLV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, RODM has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RODM has performed better with a 9.24% return vs 8.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPLV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for RODM.
RODM has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 2.15% for SPLV.
SPLV is categorized as S&P 500, while RODM is Foreign Large Cap Equities. SPLV tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Index, while RODM tracks Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SPLV and 0.29% for RODM.
RODM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPLV and RODM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer