PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPIT vs. ZMUN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPIT vs. ZMUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT) and F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF (ZMUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPIT achieves a 25.12% return, which is significantly higher than ZMUN's 1.97% return.


SPIT

1D
-1.56%
1M
-1.75%
6M
14.70%
YTD
25.12%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZMUN

1D
0.00%
1M
0.21%
6M
1.80%
YTD
1.97%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPIT vs. ZMUN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SPIT and ZMUN is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2025

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPIT vs. ZMUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT) and F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF (ZMUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SPIT vs. ZMUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPIT vs. ZMUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPIT drawdown since its inception was -12.49%, which is greater than ZMUN's maximum drawdown of -0.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPIT and ZMUN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPITZMUNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.49%

-0.13%

-12.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.05%

0.00%

-7.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.56%

-0.02%

-2.54%

Volatility

SPIT vs. ZMUN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPITZMUNDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.27%

0.54%

+25.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.27%

0.54%

+25.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.27%

0.54%

+25.73%

SPIT vs. ZMUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPIT has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than ZMUN's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPIT vs. ZMUN - Dividend Comparison

SPIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.74%, more than ZMUN's 2.59% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


SPIT and ZMUN have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZMUN is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZMUN is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SPIT.

SPIT has the higher dividend yield at 5.74%, compared with 2.59% for ZMUN.

SPIT is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ZMUN is Municipal Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for SPIT and 0.30% for ZMUN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPIT and ZMUN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer