SPIT vs. ISCMF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SPIT (F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF) and ISCMF (iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPIT is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by F/m Investments, while ISCMF is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index. SPIT is actively managed, while ISCMF is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. SPIT charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ISCMF.

Performance

SPIT vs. ISCMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPIT achieves a 25.30% return, which is significantly higher than ISCMF's 22.87% return.

SPIT

• 1D: -1.85%
• 1M: 3.31%
• YTD: 25.30%
• 6M: 23.29%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ISCMF

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.67%
• YTD: 22.87%
• 6M: 27.76%
• 1Y: 37.85%
• 3Y*: 15.20%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPIT vs. ISCMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF	25.30%	5.20%
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF	22.87%	7.57%

Correlation

The correlation between SPIT and ISCMF is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025	-0.10

Return for Risk

SPIT vs. ISCMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISCMF

ISCMF Risk / Return Rank: 83
ISCMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
ISCMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
ISCMF Omega Ratio Rank: 99
ISCMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
ISCMF Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPIT vs. ISCMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPIT	ISCMF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.05	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.00	0.45	+1.55

Drawdowns

SPIT vs. ISCMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPIT drawdown since its inception was -12.49%, smaller than the maximum ISCMF drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPIT and ISCMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPIT	ISCMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.49%	-25.42%	+12.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.69%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-7.62%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.85%	-5.26%	+3.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.62%	-13.43%	+10.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.42%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SPIT	ISCMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.14%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	15.90%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.35%	18.53%	+7.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.35%	14.38%	+11.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.35%	14.38%	+11.97%

SPIT vs. ISCMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPIT has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCMF's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPIT vs. ISCMF - Dividend Comparison

SPIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.73%, while ISCMF has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF	5.73%	7.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPIT and ISCMF in my portfolio?

SPIT and ISCMF have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SPIT or ISCMF?

On fees, ISCMF is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPIT or ISCMF?

ISCMF is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SPIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPIT or ISCMF?

SPIT has the higher dividend yield at 5.73%, compared with 0.00% for ISCMF.

What is the main difference between SPIT and ISCMF?

SPIT is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ISCMF is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: F/m Investments and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for SPIT and 0.19% for ISCMF.