SPIP vs. GTIP
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF (SPIP) and Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF (GTIP).
SPIP and GTIP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SPIP is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Barclays US Government Inflation-linked Bond Index. It was launched on May 25, 2007. GTIP is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the FTSE Goldman Sachs Treasury Inflation Protected USD Bond Index. It was launched on Oct 2, 2018. Both SPIP and GTIP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SPIP vs. GTIP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SPIP vs. GTIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPIP SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF | 0.27% | 6.78% | 2.35% | 2.98% | -12.84% | 5.80% | 11.41% | 9.14% | 0.36% |
GTIP Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF | 0.49% | 6.63% | 2.04% | 3.88% | -12.14% | 5.86% | 10.83% | 8.33% | 0.24% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPIP achieves a 0.27% return, which is significantly lower than GTIP's 0.49% return.
SPIP
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -1.48%
- YTD
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 0.20%
- 1Y
- 2.65%
- 3Y*
- 2.91%
- 5Y*
- 1.15%
- 10Y*
- 2.53%
GTIP
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -1.35%
- YTD
- 0.49%
- 6M
- 0.38%
- 1Y
- 2.93%
- 3Y*
- 3.06%
- 5Y*
- 1.34%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SPIP vs. GTIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SPIP and GTIP have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
SPIP vs. GTIP — Risk / Return Rank
SPIP
GTIP
SPIP vs. GTIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF (SPIP) and Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF (GTIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPIP | GTIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.61 | 0.73 | -0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.83 | 1.03 | -0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.13 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.05 | 1.15 | -0.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.04 | 3.44 | -0.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPIP | GTIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 | 0.73 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.22 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.54 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between SPIP and GTIP is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SPIP vs. GTIP - Dividend Comparison
SPIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, less than GTIP's 4.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPIP SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF | 4.05% | 4.09% | 3.36% | 3.70% | 7.05% | 4.53% | 1.97% | 2.91% | 2.80% | 3.02% | 1.88% | 0.14% |
GTIP Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF | 4.43% | 4.58% | 3.52% | 2.77% | 6.47% | 3.82% | 1.04% | 2.34% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SPIP vs. GTIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPIP drawdown since its inception was -15.39%, which is greater than GTIP's maximum drawdown of -14.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPIP and GTIP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPIP | GTIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.39% | -14.31% | -1.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.92% | -2.86% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.39% | -14.31% | -1.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.21% | -1.35% | -0.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.13% | -4.32% | +0.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.01% | 0.96% | +0.05% |
Volatility
SPIP vs. GTIP - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF (SPIP) has a higher volatility of 1.75% compared to Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF (GTIP) at 1.42%. This indicates that SPIP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GTIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SPIP | GTIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.75% | 1.42% | +0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.55% | 2.33% | +0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.39% | 4.05% | +0.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.59% | 6.08% | +0.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.03% | 6.06% | -0.03% |