SPICHA.SW vs. QQQI

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SPICHA.SW (UBS ETF (CH) – SPI® (CHF) A-dis) and QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPICHA.SW is a Europe Equities fund tracking the SPI® Index, while QQQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos. SPICHA.SW is passively managed, while QQQI is actively managed. Over the past year, SPICHA.SW returned 10.32% vs 22.21% for QQQI. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPICHA.SW charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for QQQI.

Performance

SPICHA.SW vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CHF 10,000 investment in UBS ETF (CH) – SPI® (CHF) A-dis (SPICHA.SW) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

SPICHA.SW is traded in CHF, while QQQI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QQQI values have been converted to CHF using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPICHA.SW achieves a 3.22% return, which is significantly lower than QQQI's 10.57% return.

SPICHA.SW

• 1D: 0.82%
• 1M: 1.60%
• YTD: 3.22%
• 6M: 5.42%
• 1Y: 10.32%
• 3Y*: 7.66%
• 5Y*: 4.66%
• 10Y*: 7.70%

QQQI

• 1D: 1.58%
• 1M: 2.81%
• YTD: 10.57%
• 6M: 8.05%
• 1Y: 22.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPICHA.SW vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SPICHA.SW UBS ETF (CH) – SPI® (CHF) A-dis	3.22%	17.65%	3.71%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	10.57%	3.65%	26.23%

Correlation

The correlation between SPICHA.SW and QQQI is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2024	0.22

Return for Risk

SPICHA.SW vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPICHA.SW

SPICHA.SW Risk / Return Rank: 26
SPICHA.SW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
SPICHA.SW Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
SPICHA.SW Omega Ratio Rank: 27
SPICHA.SW Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
SPICHA.SW Martin Ratio Rank: 26

QQQI

QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 64
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 66
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPICHA.SW vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (CH) – SPI® (CHF) A-dis (SPICHA.SW) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPICHA.SW	QQQI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.97	1.48	-0.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.45	1.96	-0.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.28	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.02	2.39	-1.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.55	7.49	-3.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPICHA.SW vs. QQQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPICHA.SW Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the QQQI Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPICHA.SW and QQQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPICHA.SW	QQQI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97	1.48	-0.51
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	0.83	-0.26

Drawdowns

SPICHA.SW vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPICHA.SW drawdown since its inception was -26.92%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -25.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPICHA.SW and QQQI.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPICHA.SW	QQQI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.92%	-25.49%	-1.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.89%	-9.35%	-1.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.90%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.48%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-26.92%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.21%	-2.38%	+0.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.21%	-4.70%	-0.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.09%	2.97%	+0.12%

Volatility

SPICHA.SW vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (CH) – SPI® (CHF) A-dis (SPICHA.SW) is 3.18%, while NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) has a volatility of 4.56%. This indicates that SPICHA.SW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPICHA.SW	QQQI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.18%	4.56%	-1.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.93%	11.11%	-2.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.37%	15.06%	-3.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.19%	20.60%	-7.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.92%	20.60%	-6.68%

SPICHA.SW vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPICHA.SW has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPICHA.SW vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison

SPICHA.SW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, less than QQQI's 13.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	13.61%	13.82%	12.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPICHA.SW UBS ETF (CH) – SPI® (CHF) A-dis	2.20%	2.64%	2.96%	2.94%	2.83%	2.26%	2.55%	2.60%	3.21%	2.62%	3.04%	2.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPICHA.SW and QQQI in my portfolio?

SPICHA.SW and QQQI have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SPICHA.SW or QQQI?

On fees, SPICHA.SW is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPICHA.SW or QQQI?

SPICHA.SW is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for QQQI.

What is the main difference between SPICHA.SW and QQQI?

SPICHA.SW is categorized as Europe Equities, while QQQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for SPICHA.SW and 0.68% for QQQI.