PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
SPICHA.SW vs. IMEA.SW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

SPICHA.SW vs. IMEA.SW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SPICHA.SW (UBS ETF (CH) – SPI® (CHF) A-dis) and IMEA.SW (iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) are both Europe Equities funds - SPICHA.SW tracks the SPI® Index while IMEA.SW tracks the MSCI Europe Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPICHA.SW returned 7.65%/yr vs 7.09%/yr for IMEA.SW. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPICHA.SW charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for IMEA.SW.

Performance

SPICHA.SW vs. IMEA.SW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CHF 10,000 investment in UBS ETF (CH) – SPI® (CHF) A-dis (SPICHA.SW) and iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IMEA.SW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPICHA.SW achieves a 2.38% return, which is significantly lower than IMEA.SW's 5.25% return. Over the past 10 years, SPICHA.SW has outperformed IMEA.SW with an annualized return of 7.65%, while IMEA.SW has yielded a comparatively lower 7.09% annualized return.

SPICHA.SW

1D
-0.57%
1M
2.01%
YTD
2.38%
6M
5.46%
1Y
10.61%
3Y*
7.26%
5Y*
4.49%
10Y*
7.65%

IMEA.SW

1D
-0.31%
1M
4.08%
YTD
5.25%
6M
7.98%
1Y
13.82%
3Y*
11.14%
5Y*
6.10%
10Y*
7.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPICHA.SW vs. IMEA.SW - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPICHA.SW
UBS ETF (CH) – SPI® (CHF) A-dis		2.38%17.65%6.05%5.82%-16.70%23.29%3.83%29.94%-8.35%19.42%
IMEA.SW
iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)		5.25%19.46%9.47%8.86%-13.54%19.51%-2.82%24.06%-15.32%21.31%

Correlation

The correlation between SPICHA.SW and IMEA.SW is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2011

0.47

Over the past year, SPICHA.SW and IMEA.SW have become more correlated (0.74) than their long-term average of 0.47, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

UBS ETF (CH) – SPI® (CHF) A-dis

iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)

Often compared with SPICHA.SW:
SPICHA.SW vs. CHDVD.SWSPICHA.SW vs. VTSPICHA.SW vs. VOOSPICHA.SW vs. VXUSSPICHA.SW vs. CHSPI.SWSPICHA.SW vs. MEUD.LSPICHA.SW vs. IHYG.L
Often compared with IMEA.SW:
IMEA.SW vs. LBNK.DEIMEA.SW vs. SX5E.SWIMEA.SW vs. WMTS.SWIMEA.SW vs. CHDVD.SWIMEA.SW vs. CHSPI.SWIMEA.SW vs. SPYI.DE

Return for Risk

SPICHA.SW vs. IMEA.SW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
SPICHA.SW
SPICHA.SW Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
SPICHA.SW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPICHA.SW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPICHA.SW Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
SPICHA.SW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPICHA.SW Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
IMEA.SW
IMEA.SW Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
IMEA.SW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMEA.SW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMEA.SW Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
IMEA.SW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMEA.SW Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPICHA.SW vs. IMEA.SW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (CH) – SPI® (CHF) A-dis (SPICHA.SW) and iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IMEA.SW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

SPICHA.SWIMEA.SWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.95
1.15

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.41
1.68

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.21

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

1.46

-0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.47

5.43

-1.96

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPICHA.SW vs. IMEA.SW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPICHA.SW Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is comparable to the IMEA.SW Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPICHA.SW and IMEA.SW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

SPICHA.SWIMEA.SWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

1.15

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.38

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.42

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.38

+0.18

Drawdowns

SPICHA.SW vs. IMEA.SW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPICHA.SW drawdown since its inception was -26.92%, smaller than the maximum IMEA.SW drawdown of -36.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPICHA.SW and IMEA.SW.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

SPICHA.SWIMEA.SWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.92%

-36.01%

+9.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.89%

-9.61%

-1.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.90%

-17.71%

+1.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.48%

-26.25%

+4.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.92%

-36.01%

+9.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.00%

-0.50%

-2.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.21%

-5.80%

+0.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

2.57%

+0.52%

Volatility

SPICHA.SW vs. IMEA.SW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (CH) – SPI® (CHF) A-dis (SPICHA.SW) is 3.25%, while iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IMEA.SW) has a volatility of 3.94%. This indicates that SPICHA.SW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMEA.SW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

SPICHA.SWIMEA.SWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.25%

3.94%

-0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.95%

10.16%

-1.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.35%

12.27%

-0.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.18%

16.10%

-2.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.92%

16.85%

-2.93%

SPICHA.SW vs. IMEA.SW - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPICHA.SW has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than IMEA.SW's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SPICHA.SW vs. IMEA.SW - Dividend Comparison

SPICHA.SW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, while IMEA.SW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMEA.SW
iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPICHA.SW
UBS ETF (CH) – SPI® (CHF) A-dis		2.22%2.64%2.96%2.94%2.83%2.26%2.55%2.60%3.21%2.62%3.04%2.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

SPICHA.SW and IMEA.SW have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPICHA.SW is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPICHA.SW is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for IMEA.SW.

SPICHA.SW tracks SPI® Index, while IMEA.SW tracks MSCI Europe Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for SPICHA.SW and 0.12% for IMEA.SW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPICHA.SW and IMEA.SW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer