SPIB vs. FLDR
SPIB (SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF) and FLDR (Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPIB is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Intermediate Corporate Bond Index, while FLDR is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the Fidelity Low Duration Investment Grade Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPIB returned 1.65%/yr vs 3.72%/yr for FLDR. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPIB charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FLDR.
Performance
SPIB vs. FLDR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPIB achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly lower than FLDR's 1.83% return.
SPIB
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- 6M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 0.42%
- 1Y
- 4.11%
- 3Y*
- 5.67%
- 5Y*
- 1.65%
- 10Y*
- 2.74%
FLDR
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- YTD
- 1.83%
- 1Y
- 4.49%
- 3Y*
- 5.28%
- 5Y*
- 3.72%
- 10Y*
- —
SPIB vs. FLDR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPIB SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF | 0.42% | 7.91% | 4.28% | 7.27% | -9.65% | -1.24% | 7.69% | 10.23% | 1.51% |
FLDR Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF | 1.83% | 5.41% | 5.71% | 6.32% | -0.33% | -0.18% | 2.01% | 4.52% | 0.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPIB and FLDR is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2018 | 0.50 |
The correlation between SPIB and FLDR shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (all time) to 0.72 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPIB vs. FLDR — Risk / Return Rank
SPIB
FLDR
SPIB vs. FLDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPIB) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPIB | FLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 2.61 | -1.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.04 | 9.65 | -7.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.70 | 65.59 | -58.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPIB vs. FLDR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPIB drawdown since its inception was -14.94%, which is greater than FLDR's maximum drawdown of -12.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPIB and FLDR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPIB | FLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.94% | -12.23% | -2.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.02% | -0.47% | -1.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.12% | -0.76% | -2.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.80% | -2.33% | -12.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.82% | -0.03% | -0.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.90% | -0.35% | -1.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.61% | 0.07% | +0.54% |
Volatility
SPIB vs. FLDR - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPIB) has a higher volatility of 0.85% compared to Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) at 0.22%. This indicates that SPIB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLDR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPIB | FLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.85% | 0.22% | +0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.26% | 0.61% | +1.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.86% | 0.80% | +2.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.48% | 1.21% | +3.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.60% | 5.23% | -0.63% |
SPIB vs. FLDR - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPIB has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than FLDR's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPIB vs. FLDR - Dividend Comparison
SPIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, more than FLDR's 4.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLDR Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF | 4.33% | 4.66% | 5.50% | 5.28% | 2.09% | 0.51% | 1.22% | 2.69% | 1.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPIB SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF | 4.48% | 4.42% | 4.41% | 3.84% | 2.65% | 1.58% | 2.18% | 3.03% | 3.04% | 2.79% | 2.68% | 2.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPIB and FLDR have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPIB has higher volatility (0.85%) compared to FLDR (0.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPIB dropped -14.94% vs FLDR's -12.23%.
On 5-year performance, FLDR leads with 3.72% vs 1.65% for SPIB. On fees, SPIB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, FLDR has been the lower-risk option at 0.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLDR has performed better with a 3.72% return vs 1.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPIB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FLDR.
SPIB has the higher dividend yield at 4.48%, compared with 4.33% for FLDR.
SPIB is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while FLDR is Short-Term Bond. SPIB tracks Bloomberg U.S. Intermediate Corporate Bond Index, while FLDR tracks Fidelity Low Duration Investment Grade Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SPIB and 0.15% for FLDR.
FLDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.64 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPIB and FLDR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer