SPHQ vs. VB

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF) and VB (Vanguard Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPHQ is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality Index, while VB is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Small Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPHQ returned 15.27%/yr vs 11.61%/yr for VB. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPHQ charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VB.

Performance

SPHQ vs. VB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPHQ achieves a 16.79% return, which is significantly higher than VB's 15.33% return. Over the past 10 years, SPHQ has outperformed VB with an annualized return of 15.27%, while VB has yielded a comparatively lower 11.61% annualized return.

SPHQ

• 1D: 1.02%
• 1M: 5.98%
• YTD: 16.79%
• 6M: 15.77%
• 1Y: 24.32%
• 3Y*: 22.40%
• 5Y*: 14.55%
• 10Y*: 15.27%

VB

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: 3.75%
• YTD: 15.33%
• 6M: 13.69%
• 1Y: 28.72%
• 3Y*: 16.14%
• 5Y*: 6.98%
• 10Y*: 11.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPHQ vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF	16.79%	13.25%	25.44%	24.83%	-15.76%	28.03%	17.36%	33.64%	-7.10%	19.10%
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF	15.33%	8.87%	14.17%	18.22%	-17.51%	17.57%	19.19%	27.34%	-9.34%	16.26%

Correlation

The correlation between SPHQ and VB is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2005	0.84

The correlation between SPHQ and VB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPHQ vs. VB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPHQ	VB
Technology	28.1%	17.2%
Industrials	24.3%	20.8%
Consumer Defensive	15.4%	3.4%
Financial Services	13.3%	12.6%
Healthcare	8.4%	11.1%
Consumer Cyclical	4.6%	11.3%
Basic Materials	2.2%	4.8%
Communication Services	2.0%	3.1%
Utilities	1.0%	3.3%
Energy	0.7%	4.7%
Real Estate	-	7.6%

Return for Risk

SPHQ vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPHQ

SPHQ Risk / Return Rank: 66
SPHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
SPHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
SPHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 60
SPHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
SPHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 73

VB

VB Risk / Return Rank: 64
VB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
VB Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
VB Omega Ratio Rank: 55
VB Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
VB Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPHQ vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SPHQ	VB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.85	1.73	+0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.67	2.47	+0.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.30	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.75	3.21	-0.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.76	11.80	-0.04

SPHQ vs. VB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPHQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the VB Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPHQ and VB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SPHQ vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPHQ drawdown since its inception was -57.83%, roughly equal to the maximum VB drawdown of -59.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHQ and VB.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPHQ	VB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.83%	-59.56%	+1.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.90%	-8.98%	+0.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.57%	-25.36%	+8.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.04%	-28.15%	+3.11%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.60%	-42.05%	+10.45%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.69%	-8.43%	-2.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.09%	2.44%	-0.35%

Volatility

SPHQ vs. VB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) is 4.92%, while Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) has a volatility of 5.41%. This indicates that SPHQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPHQ	VB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.92%	5.41%	-0.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.83%	12.24%	-1.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.18%	16.68%	-3.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.53%	20.80%	-4.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.90%	21.44%	-3.54%

SPHQ vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPHQ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VB's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SPHQ vs. VB - Dividend Comparison

SPHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than VB's 1.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF	1.03%	1.09%	1.15%	1.42%	1.85%	1.19%	1.55%	1.51%	1.85%	1.57%	1.67%	2.29%
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF	1.18%	1.33%	1.30%	1.55%	1.59%	1.24%	1.14%	1.39%	1.67%	1.35%	1.50%	1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPHQ and VB in my portfolio?

SPHQ and VB have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPHQ or VB?

VB has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to SPHQ (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHQ dropped -57.83% vs VB's -59.56%.

Which ETF is better, SPHQ or VB?

On 10-year performance, SPHQ leads with 15.27% vs 11.61% for VB. On fees, VB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, SPHQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPHQ or VB?

Over the 10-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 15.27% return vs 11.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPHQ or VB?

VB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SPHQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPHQ or VB?

VB has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 1.03% for SPHQ.

What is the main difference between SPHQ and VB?

SPHQ is categorized as S&P 500, while VB is Small Cap Blend Equities. SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index, while VB tracks CRSP US Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SPHQ and 0.05% for VB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.