SPHQ vs. SPYM
SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF) and SPYM (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF) are both S&P 500 funds - SPHQ tracks the S&P 500 Quality Index while SPYM tracks the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPHQ returned 14.98%/yr vs 15.70%/yr for SPYM. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPHQ charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for SPYM.
Performance
SPHQ vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPHQ achieves a 15.16% return, which is significantly higher than SPYM's 11.72% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SPHQ having a 14.98% annualized return and SPYM not far ahead at 15.70%.
SPHQ
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 6.56%
- YTD
- 15.16%
- 6M
- 16.32%
- 1Y
- 23.61%
- 3Y*
- 22.29%
- 5Y*
- 14.73%
- 10Y*
- 14.98%
SPYM
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 5.39%
- YTD
- 11.72%
- 6M
- 12.10%
- 1Y
- 29.72%
- 3Y*
- 22.73%
- 5Y*
- 14.26%
- 10Y*
- 15.70%
SPHQ vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 15.16% | 13.25% | 25.44% | 24.83% | -15.76% | 28.03% | 17.36% | 33.64% | -7.10% | 19.10% |
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 11.72% | 17.79% | 25.00% | 26.24% | -18.09% | 28.78% | 18.49% | 31.99% | -4.78% | 21.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPHQ and SPYM is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2005 | 0.80 |
The correlation between SPHQ and SPYM shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (all time) to 0.93 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPHQ vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPHQ
SPYM
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
Real Estate
-
Technology
SPHQ
SPYM
Industrials
SPHQ
SPYM
Consumer Defensive
SPHQ
SPYM
Financial Services
SPHQ
SPYM
Healthcare
SPHQ
SPYM
Consumer Cyclical
SPHQ
SPYM
Basic Materials
SPHQ
SPYM
Communication Services
SPHQ
SPYM
Utilities
SPHQ
SPYM
Energy
SPHQ
SPYM
Real Estate
SPHQ
-
SPYM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPHQ vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank
SPHQ
SPYM
SPHQ vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPHQ | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.88 | 2.54 | -0.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.73 | 3.44 | -0.71 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.46 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 3.42 | -0.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.50 | 15.95 | -4.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPHQ | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 2.54 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 0.85 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | 0.88 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.62 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
SPHQ vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPHQ drawdown since its inception was -57.83%, which is greater than SPYM's maximum drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHQ and SPYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPHQ | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.83% | -54.46% | -3.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -8.90% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.57% | -18.72% | +2.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.04% | -24.48% | -0.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.60% | -33.87% | +2.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.70% | -7.15% | -3.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.08% | 1.91% | +0.17% |
Volatility
SPHQ vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) has a higher volatility of 3.55% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) at 2.74%. This indicates that SPHQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPHQ | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.55% | 2.74% | +0.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.20% | 8.89% | +1.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.62% | 11.78% | +0.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.45% | 16.80% | -0.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.87% | 18.01% | -0.14% |
SPHQ vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPHQ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPHQ vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison
SPHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, more than SPYM's 0.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 1.04% | 1.09% | 1.15% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.85% | 1.57% | 1.67% | 2.29% |
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 0.99% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.79% | 2.23% | 1.75% | 1.97% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPHQ and SPYM have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPHQ has higher volatility (3.55%) compared to SPYM (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHQ dropped -57.83% vs SPYM's -54.46%.
On 10-year performance, SPYM leads with 15.70% vs 14.98% for SPHQ. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 15.70% return vs 14.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SPHQ.
SPHQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.99% for SPYM.
SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index, while SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SPHQ and 0.02% for SPYM.
SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPHQ and SPYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer