SPHQ vs. SPXL
SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF) and SPXL (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPHQ is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality Index, while SPXL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPHQ returned 14.44%/yr vs 28.37%/yr for SPXL. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPHQ charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.84%/yr for SPXL.
Performance
SPHQ vs. SPXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPHQ achieves a 13.65% return, which is significantly lower than SPXL's 20.97% return. Over the past 10 years, SPHQ has underperformed SPXL with an annualized return of 14.44%, while SPXL has yielded a comparatively higher 28.37% annualized return.
SPHQ
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- -3.73%
- 6M
- 10.07%
- YTD
- 13.65%
- 1Y
- 19.91%
- 3Y*
- 19.52%
- 5Y*
- 13.11%
- 10Y*
- 14.44%
SPXL
- 1D
- -3.10%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- 6M
- 16.58%
- YTD
- 20.97%
- 1Y
- 47.72%
- 3Y*
- 41.59%
- 5Y*
- 20.48%
- 10Y*
- 28.37%
SPHQ vs. SPXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 13.65% | 13.25% | 25.44% | 24.83% | -15.76% | 28.03% | 17.36% | 33.64% | -7.10% | 19.10% |
SPXL Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF | 20.97% | 31.94% | 63.61% | 69.49% | -56.55% | 98.75% | 9.64% | 102.80% | -25.11% | 71.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPHQ and SPXL is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2008 | 0.92 |
The correlation between SPHQ and SPXL shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.93 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPHQ vs. SPXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPHQ
SPXL
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Energy
Real Estate
-
Technology
SPHQ
SPXL
Financial Services
SPHQ
SPXL
Industrials
SPHQ
SPXL
Consumer Defensive
SPHQ
SPXL
Consumer Cyclical
SPHQ
SPXL
Utilities
SPHQ
SPXL
Communication Services
SPHQ
SPXL
Basic Materials
SPHQ
SPXL
Healthcare
SPHQ
SPXL
Energy
SPHQ
SPXL
Real Estate
SPHQ
-
SPXL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPHQ vs. SPXL — Risk / Return Rank
SPHQ
SPXL
SPHQ vs. SPXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPHQ | SPXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.23 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.25 | 1.79 | +0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.97 | 7.05 | +1.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPHQ vs. SPXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPHQ drawdown since its inception was -57.83%, smaller than the maximum SPXL drawdown of -76.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHQ and SPXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPHQ | SPXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.83% | -76.86% | +19.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -26.77% | +17.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.57% | -48.95% | +32.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.04% | -63.80% | +38.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.60% | -76.86% | +45.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.90% | -7.56% | +1.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.65% | -16.06% | +5.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 6.79% | -4.57% |
Volatility
SPHQ vs. SPXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) is 6.32%, while Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) has a volatility of 11.10%. This indicates that SPHQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPHQ | SPXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.32% | 11.10% | -4.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.21% | 30.23% | -18.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.26% | 37.82% | -23.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 50.59% | -33.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.95% | 53.39% | -35.44% |
SPHQ vs. SPXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPHQ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SPXL's 0.84% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPHQ vs. SPXL - Dividend Comparison
SPHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, more than SPXL's 0.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 1.10% | 1.09% | 1.15% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.85% | 1.57% | 1.67% | 2.29% |
SPXL Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF | 0.54% | 0.69% | 0.74% | 0.98% | 0.32% | 0.11% | 0.22% | 0.84% | 1.02% | 3.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPHQ and SPXL have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPXL has higher volatility (11.10%) compared to SPHQ (6.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHQ dropped -57.83% vs SPXL's -76.86%.
On 10-year performance, SPXL leads with 28.37% vs 14.44% for SPHQ. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SPHQ has been the lower-risk option at 6.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPXL has performed better with a 28.37% return vs 14.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.84% for SPXL.
SPHQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.10%, compared with 0.54% for SPXL.
SPHQ is categorized as S&P 500, while SPXL is Leveraged Equities. SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index, while SPXL tracks S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SPHQ and 0.84% for SPXL.
SPHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPHQ and SPXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer