SPHQ vs. SMH
SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPHQ is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality Index, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPHQ returned 15.47%/yr vs 38.18%/yr for SMH. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPHQ charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
SPHQ vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPHQ achieves a 18.64% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 79.69% return. Over the past 10 years, SPHQ has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 15.47%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 38.18% annualized return.
SPHQ
- 1D
- 1.58%
- 1M
- 7.41%
- YTD
- 18.64%
- 6M
- 17.69%
- 1Y
- 28.53%
- 3Y*
- 22.52%
- 5Y*
- 15.06%
- 10Y*
- 15.47%
SMH
- 1D
- 4.38%
- 1M
- 16.31%
- YTD
- 79.69%
- 6M
- 83.94%
- 1Y
- 152.58%
- 3Y*
- 62.32%
- 5Y*
- 39.72%
- 10Y*
- 38.18%
SPHQ vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 18.64% | 13.25% | 25.44% | 24.83% | -15.76% | 28.03% | 17.36% | 33.64% | -7.10% | 19.10% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 79.69% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPHQ and SMH is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2005 | 0.72 |
The correlation between SPHQ and SMH shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.76 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPHQ vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPHQ
SMH
Technology
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
SPHQ
SMH
Industrials
SPHQ
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
SPHQ
SMH
-
Financial Services
SPHQ
SMH
-
Healthcare
SPHQ
SMH
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPHQ
SMH
-
Utilities
SPHQ
SMH
-
Basic Materials
SPHQ
SMH
-
Energy
SPHQ
SMH
-
Communication Services
SPHQ
SMH
-
Real Estate
SPHQ
-
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPHQ vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
SPHQ
SMH
SPHQ vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPHQ | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.65 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.22 | 10.28 | -7.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.80 | 37.77 | -23.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPHQ vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPHQ drawdown since its inception was -57.83%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHQ and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPHQ | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.83% | -84.96% | +27.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -14.93% | +6.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.57% | -35.74% | +19.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.04% | -45.30% | +20.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.60% | -45.30% | +13.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.68% | -41.04% | +30.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 4.06% | -1.99% |
Volatility
SPHQ vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) is 5.05%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 16.71%. This indicates that SPHQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPHQ | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.05% | 16.71% | -11.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.88% | 27.97% | -17.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.16% | 33.39% | -20.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.55% | 35.53% | -18.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.91% | 32.86% | -14.95% |
SPHQ vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPHQ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPHQ vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
SPHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, more than SMH's 0.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 1.01% | 1.09% | 1.15% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.85% | 1.57% | 1.67% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPHQ and SMH have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (16.71%) compared to SPHQ (5.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHQ dropped -57.83% vs SMH's -84.96%.
On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 38.18% vs 15.47% for SPHQ. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SPHQ has been the lower-risk option at 5.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 38.18% return vs 15.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMH.
SPHQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.17% for SMH.
SPHQ is categorized as S&P 500, while SMH is Semiconductors. SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SPHQ and 0.35% for SMH.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.61 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPHQ and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer