PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPHQ vs. QVAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPHQ vs. QVAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SPHQ having a 13.62% return and QVAL slightly higher at 14.17%. Over the past 10 years, SPHQ has outperformed QVAL with an annualized return of 14.79%, while QVAL has yielded a comparatively lower 11.40% annualized return.


SPHQ

1D
-2.19%
1M
3.69%
YTD
13.62%
6M
14.14%
1Y
20.46%
3Y*
21.90%
5Y*
14.17%
10Y*
14.79%

QVAL

1D
-0.86%
1M
2.77%
YTD
14.17%
6M
15.05%
1Y
28.68%
3Y*
20.83%
5Y*
12.04%
10Y*
11.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPHQ vs. QVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
13.62%13.25%25.44%24.83%-15.76%28.03%17.36%33.64%-7.10%19.10%
QVAL
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
14.17%10.98%12.21%28.40%-11.80%34.40%-5.93%24.06%-17.28%25.59%

Correlation

The correlation between SPHQ and QVAL is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.72

The correlation between SPHQ and QVAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPHQ vs. QVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPHQ
QVAL

Technology

28.1%
16.7%

Industrials

24.3%
15.0%

Consumer Defensive

15.4%
7.9%

Financial Services

13.3%

-

Healthcare

8.4%
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

4.6%
32.4%

Basic Materials

2.2%
7.6%

Communication Services

2.0%
3.8%

Utilities

1.0%

-

Energy

0.7%
5.5%

Real Estate

-

2.0%

Technology

SPHQ
28.1%
QVAL
16.7%

Industrials

SPHQ
24.3%
QVAL
15.0%

Consumer Defensive

SPHQ
15.4%
QVAL
7.9%

Financial Services

SPHQ
13.3%
QVAL

-

Healthcare

SPHQ
8.4%
QVAL
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SPHQ
4.6%
QVAL
32.4%

Basic Materials

SPHQ
2.2%
QVAL
7.6%

Communication Services

SPHQ
2.0%
QVAL
3.8%

Utilities

SPHQ
1.0%
QVAL

-

Energy

SPHQ
0.7%
QVAL
5.5%

Real Estate

SPHQ

-

QVAL
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPHQ vs. QVAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPHQ
SPHQ Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
SPHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

QVAL
QVAL Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
QVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
QVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
QVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPHQ vs. QVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPHQQVALDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.36

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

5.01

-2.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.27

14.17

-3.90

SPHQ vs. QVAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPHQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the QVAL Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPHQ and QVAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPHQQVALDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68

2.09

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.56

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.50

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.49

+0.04

Drawdowns

SPHQ vs. QVAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPHQ drawdown since its inception was -57.83%, which is greater than QVAL's maximum drawdown of -51.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHQ and QVAL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPHQQVALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.83%

-51.49%

-6.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-6.04%

-2.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.57%

-21.41%

+4.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.04%

-27.17%

+2.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.60%

-51.49%

+19.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.19%

-1.23%

-0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.70%

-7.79%

-2.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

2.13%

-0.04%

Volatility

SPHQ vs. QVAL - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) have volatilities of 4.03% and 4.05%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPHQQVALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.03%

4.05%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.44%

10.03%

+0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.83%

14.43%

-1.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.47%

21.63%

-5.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.87%

22.79%

-4.92%

SPHQ vs. QVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPHQ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than QVAL's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPHQ vs. QVAL - Dividend Comparison

SPHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than QVAL's 1.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QVAL
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
1.47%1.44%1.72%1.76%2.00%1.23%1.86%1.99%1.64%1.08%1.30%0.00%
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
1.06%1.09%1.15%1.42%1.85%1.19%1.55%1.51%1.85%1.57%1.67%2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPHQ and QVAL have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QVAL has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to SPHQ (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHQ dropped -57.83% vs QVAL's -51.49%.

On 10-year performance, SPHQ leads with 14.79% vs 11.40% for QVAL. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 14.79% return vs 11.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for QVAL.

QVAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 1.06% for SPHQ.

SPHQ is categorized as S&P 500, while QVAL is Mid Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SPHQ and 0.28% for QVAL.

QVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPHQ and QVAL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer