PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPHQ vs. DGRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPHQ vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPHQ achieves a 14.14% return, which is significantly higher than DGRW's 10.05% return. Over the past 10 years, SPHQ has outperformed DGRW with an annualized return of 14.58%, while DGRW has yielded a comparatively lower 13.79% annualized return.


SPHQ

1D
0.56%
1M
-3.11%
6M
8.93%
YTD
14.14%
1Y
21.69%
3Y*
19.92%
5Y*
12.81%
10Y*
14.58%
ALL TIME*
10.03%

DGRW

1D
1.37%
1M
2.07%
6M
6.86%
YTD
10.05%
1Y
17.60%
3Y*
15.28%
5Y*
11.72%
10Y*
13.79%
ALL TIME*
13.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$51.74M$49.20M$56.02M
$121.34M$134.31M$144.70M

SPHQ vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
14.14%13.25%25.44%24.83%-15.76%28.03%17.36%33.64%-7.10%19.10%
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
10.05%12.17%16.98%18.66%-6.33%24.46%13.87%29.54%-5.38%26.90%

Correlation

The correlation between SPHQ and DGRW is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2013

0.92

The correlation between SPHQ and DGRW shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPHQ vs. DGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPHQ
DGRW

Technology

41.2%
33.8%

Industrials

17.7%
11.8%

Financial Services

15.2%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

7.5%
6.7%

Communication Services

6.4%
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

5.3%
8.0%

Utilities

4.5%
0.2%

Healthcare

3.2%
12.8%

Basic Materials

2.5%
2.8%

Energy

1.0%
4.5%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

SPHQ
41.2%
DGRW
33.8%

Industrials

SPHQ
17.7%
DGRW
11.8%

Financial Services

SPHQ
15.2%
DGRW
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

SPHQ
7.5%
DGRW
6.7%

Communication Services

SPHQ
6.4%
DGRW
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SPHQ
5.3%
DGRW
8.0%

Utilities

SPHQ
4.5%
DGRW
0.2%

Healthcare

SPHQ
3.2%
DGRW
12.8%

Basic Materials

SPHQ
2.5%
DGRW
2.8%

Energy

SPHQ
1.0%
DGRW
4.5%

Real Estate

SPHQ

-

DGRW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPHQ vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPHQ
SPHQ Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SPHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRW
DGRW Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
DGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPHQ vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPHQDGRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.31

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

2.13

+0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.64

8.60

+0.04

SPHQ vs. DGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPHQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the DGRW Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPHQ and DGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPHQ vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPHQ drawdown since its inception was -57.83%, which is greater than DGRW's maximum drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHQ and DGRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPHQDGRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.83%

-32.04%

-25.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-8.30%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.57%

-16.21%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.04%

-17.27%

-7.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.60%

-32.04%

+0.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.50%

0.00%

-5.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.64%

-3.00%

-7.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

2.05%

+0.47%

Volatility

SPHQ vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) has a higher volatility of 4.77% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) at 3.19%. This indicates that SPHQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPHQDGRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.77%

3.19%

+1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.37%

8.44%

+3.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.51%

10.47%

+4.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.74%

14.02%

+2.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.98%

16.19%

+1.79%

SPHQ vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPHQ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPHQ vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison

SPHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than DGRW's 1.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.26%1.43%1.55%1.74%2.15%1.78%1.93%2.20%2.42%1.71%2.13%2.18%
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
1.10%1.09%1.15%1.42%1.85%1.19%1.55%1.51%1.85%1.57%1.67%2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPHQ and DGRW have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPHQ has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to DGRW (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHQ dropped -57.83% vs DGRW's -32.04%.

On 10-year performance, SPHQ leads with 14.58% vs 13.79% for DGRW. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, DGRW has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 14.58% return vs 13.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for DGRW.

DGRW has the higher dividend yield at 1.26%, compared with 1.10% for SPHQ.

SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index, while DGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SPHQ and 0.28% for DGRW.

DGRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPHQ and DGRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer