SPHQ vs. BOTZ
SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF) and BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPHQ is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality Index, while BOTZ is a Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPHQ returned 15.06%/yr vs 2.06%/yr for BOTZ. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPHQ charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for BOTZ.
Performance
SPHQ vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPHQ achieves a 18.64% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's 5.58% return.
SPHQ
- 1D
- 1.58%
- 1M
- 7.41%
- YTD
- 18.64%
- 6M
- 17.69%
- 1Y
- 28.53%
- 3Y*
- 22.52%
- 5Y*
- 15.06%
- 10Y*
- 15.47%
BOTZ
- 1D
- 3.04%
- 1M
- -4.92%
- YTD
- 5.58%
- 6M
- 6.30%
- 1Y
- 24.59%
- 3Y*
- 9.30%
- 5Y*
- 2.06%
- 10Y*
- —
SPHQ vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 18.64% | 13.25% | 25.44% | 24.83% | -15.76% | 28.03% | 17.36% | 33.64% | -7.10% | 19.10% |
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 5.58% | 14.17% | 12.26% | 38.97% | -42.69% | 8.65% | 51.92% | 31.80% | -28.34% | 58.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPHQ and BOTZ is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2016 | 0.74 |
The correlation between SPHQ and BOTZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.76 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPHQ vs. BOTZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPHQ
BOTZ
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
SPHQ
BOTZ
Industrials
SPHQ
BOTZ
Consumer Defensive
SPHQ
BOTZ
Financial Services
SPHQ
BOTZ
Healthcare
SPHQ
BOTZ
Consumer Cyclical
SPHQ
BOTZ
Utilities
SPHQ
BOTZ
Basic Materials
SPHQ
BOTZ
Energy
SPHQ
BOTZ
Communication Services
SPHQ
BOTZ
Real Estate
SPHQ
-
BOTZ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPHQ vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank
SPHQ
BOTZ
SPHQ vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPHQ | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.18 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.22 | 1.28 | +1.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.80 | 4.20 | +9.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPHQ vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPHQ drawdown since its inception was -57.83%, roughly equal to the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHQ and BOTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPHQ | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.83% | -55.54% | -2.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -19.34% | +10.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.57% | -29.02% | +12.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.04% | -55.54% | +30.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -8.12% | +8.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.68% | -18.28% | +7.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 5.86% | -3.79% |
Volatility
SPHQ vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) is 5.05%, while Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) has a volatility of 9.53%. This indicates that SPHQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPHQ | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.05% | 9.53% | -4.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.88% | 19.72% | -8.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.16% | 25.24% | -12.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.55% | 26.95% | -10.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.91% | 25.81% | -7.90% |
SPHQ vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPHQ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPHQ vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison
SPHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, more than BOTZ's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 0.62% | 0.66% | 0.13% | 0.20% | 0.23% | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.83% | 1.44% | 0.01% | 0.06% | 0.00% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 1.01% | 1.09% | 1.15% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.85% | 1.57% | 1.67% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPHQ and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BOTZ has higher volatility (9.53%) compared to SPHQ (5.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHQ dropped -57.83% vs BOTZ's -55.54%.
On 5-year performance, SPHQ leads with 15.06% vs 2.06% for BOTZ. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SPHQ has been the lower-risk option at 5.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 15.06% return vs 2.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.
SPHQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.62% for BOTZ.
SPHQ is categorized as S&P 500, while BOTZ is Robotics. SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index, while BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SPHQ and 0.68% for BOTZ.
SPHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPHQ and BOTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer