PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPHD vs. QYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPHD vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SPHD having a 8.51% return and QYLD slightly lower at 8.36%. Over the past 10 years, SPHD has underperformed QYLD with an annualized return of 7.41%, while QYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 9.92% annualized return.


SPHD

1D
-1.12%
1M
4.38%
YTD
8.51%
6M
7.65%
1Y
12.70%
3Y*
11.55%
5Y*
6.57%
10Y*
7.41%

QYLD

1D
0.66%
1M
2.81%
YTD
8.36%
6M
10.14%
1Y
23.80%
3Y*
13.95%
5Y*
8.41%
10Y*
9.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPHD vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
8.51%3.41%18.08%1.32%0.58%24.98%-9.98%20.26%-6.17%11.90%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
8.36%9.28%19.35%22.77%-19.08%10.41%8.72%22.69%-3.07%18.79%

Correlation

The correlation between SPHD and QYLD is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2013

0.40

Over the past year, the correlation between SPHD and QYLD has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPHD vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPHD
SPHD Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
SPHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHD Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHD Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

QYLD
QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPHD vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPHDQYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.58

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

4.81

-3.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.31

27.11

-22.80

SPHD vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPHD Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPHD and QYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPHD vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPHD drawdown since its inception was -41.39%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHD and QYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPHDQYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.39%

-24.75%

-16.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.33%

-4.97%

-2.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.29%

-19.06%

+5.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.50%

-24.61%

+5.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.39%

-24.75%

-16.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.63%

0.00%

-1.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.70%

-3.83%

-0.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

0.88%

+2.08%

Volatility

SPHD vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) have volatilities of 3.91% and 3.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPHDQYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.91%

3.87%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.86%

7.86%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.27%

9.19%

+2.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.21%

14.77%

-0.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.66%

15.53%

+2.13%

SPHD vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPHD has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPHD vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

SPHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%, less than QYLD's 11.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
11.41%11.55%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
4.45%4.02%3.41%4.48%3.89%3.45%4.89%4.07%4.40%3.14%3.83%3.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPHD and QYLD have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPHD has higher volatility (3.91%) compared to QYLD (3.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHD dropped -41.39% vs QYLD's -24.75%.

On 10-year performance, QYLD leads with 9.92% vs 7.41% for SPHD. On fees, SPHD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QYLD has performed better with a 9.92% return vs 7.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPHD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QYLD.

QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.41%, compared with 4.45% for SPHD.

SPHD is categorized as Dividend, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. SPHD tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index, while QYLD tracks CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for SPHD and 0.60% for QYLD.

QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPHD and QYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer