PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPHD vs. DFND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPHD vs. DFND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SPHD having a 7.08% annualized return and DFND not far ahead at 7.16%.


SPHD

1D
-0.89%
1M
-0.82%
YTD
4.38%
6M
4.63%
1Y
8.12%
3Y*
11.42%
5Y*
5.48%
10Y*
7.08%

DFND

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
-1.09%
1Y
0.20%
3Y*
7.91%
5Y*
4.54%
10Y*
7.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPHD vs. DFND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
4.38%3.41%18.08%1.32%0.58%24.98%-9.98%20.26%-6.17%11.90%
DFND
Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF
0.00%10.37%8.48%12.13%-19.59%14.80%16.12%19.53%-1.83%16.33%

Correlation

The correlation between SPHD and DFND is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2016

0.30

Over the past year, the correlation between SPHD and DFND has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.30, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SPHD vs. DFND - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPHD
DFND

Real Estate

20.1%
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

17.8%
4.2%

Financial Services

15.6%
18.2%

Energy

14.1%
1.7%

Utilities

13.7%

-

Communication Services

8.6%
0.8%

Healthcare

5.1%
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

3.4%
3.5%

Technology

1.5%
24.8%

Industrials

0.0%
17.1%

Basic Materials

-

4.3%

Real Estate

SPHD
20.1%
DFND
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

SPHD
17.8%
DFND
4.2%

Financial Services

SPHD
15.6%
DFND
18.2%

Energy

SPHD
14.1%
DFND
1.7%

Utilities

SPHD
13.7%
DFND

-

Communication Services

SPHD
8.6%
DFND
0.8%

Healthcare

SPHD
5.1%
DFND
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

SPHD
3.4%
DFND
3.5%

Technology

SPHD
1.5%
DFND
24.8%

Industrials

SPHD
0.0%
DFND
17.1%

Basic Materials

SPHD

-

DFND
4.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPHD vs. DFND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPHD
SPHD Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
SPHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHD Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHD Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

DFND
DFND Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
DFND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFND Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFND Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
DFND Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFND Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPHD vs. DFND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPHDDFNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.02

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

0.07

+1.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.78

0.13

+2.65

SPHD vs. DFND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPHD Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is higher than the DFND Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPHD and DFND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPHDDFNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

0.02

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.21

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.38

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.36

+0.22

Drawdowns

SPHD vs. DFND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPHD drawdown since its inception was -41.39%, which is greater than DFND's maximum drawdown of -22.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHD and DFND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPHDDFNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.39%

-22.65%

-18.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.33%

-3.44%

-3.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.29%

-12.56%

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.50%

-22.65%

+3.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.39%

-22.65%

-18.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.37%

-3.69%

-1.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.70%

-5.70%

+1.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

3.70%

-0.77%

Volatility

SPHD vs. DFND - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) has a higher volatility of 2.99% compared to Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) at 0.00%. This indicates that SPHD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPHDDFNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

0.00%

+2.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.55%

6.16%

+1.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.04%

10.92%

+0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.16%

22.46%

-8.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.64%

19.09%

-1.45%

SPHD vs. DFND - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPHD has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than DFND's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPHD vs. DFND - Dividend Comparison

SPHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, more than DFND's 0.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFND
Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF
0.62%1.10%1.64%1.84%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.77%0.53%0.02%0.00%0.00%
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
4.62%4.02%3.41%4.48%3.89%3.45%4.89%4.07%4.40%3.14%3.83%3.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPHD and DFND have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPHD has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to DFND (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHD dropped -41.39% vs DFND's -22.65%.

On 10-year performance, DFND leads with 7.16% vs 7.08% for SPHD. On fees, SPHD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, DFND has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DFND has performed better with a 7.16% return vs 7.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPHD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DFND.

SPHD has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 0.62% for DFND.

SPHD is categorized as Dividend, while DFND is Large Cap Blend Equities. SPHD tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index, while DFND tracks Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and SRN Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for SPHD and 1.50% for DFND.

SPHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPHD and DFND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer