SPHB vs. WNTR

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

SPHB (Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF) and WNTR (YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPHB is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 High Beta Index, while WNTR is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. SPHB is passively managed, while WNTR is actively managed. Over the past year, SPHB returned 59.71% vs 97.02% for WNTR. At a correlation of -0.46, they often move in opposite directions. SPHB charges 0.25%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for WNTR.

Performance

SPHB vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPHB achieves a 29.51% return, which is significantly higher than WNTR's 10.46% return.

SPHB

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 6.48%
• YTD: 29.51%
• 6M: 26.37%
• 1Y: 59.71%
• 3Y*: 28.36%
• 5Y*: 15.42%
• 10Y*: 19.51%

WNTR

• 1D: 6.01%
• 1M: 37.47%
• YTD: 10.46%
• 6M: 14.06%
• 1Y: 97.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPHB vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SPHB Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF	29.51%	43.25%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	10.46%	52.78%

Correlation

The correlation between SPHB and WNTR is -0.45, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025	-0.46

Return for Risk

SPHB vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPHB

SPHB Risk / Return Rank: 85
SPHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
SPHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
SPHB Omega Ratio Rank: 77
SPHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
SPHB Martin Ratio Rank: 92

WNTR

WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 51
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 52
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPHB vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SPHB	WNTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.48	1.85	+0.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.06	2.20	+0.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.30	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.61	2.29	+3.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.02	5.85	+15.17

SPHB vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPHB Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is higher than the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPHB and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SPHB vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPHB drawdown since its inception was -46.84%, which is greater than WNTR's maximum drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHB and WNTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPHB	WNTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.84%	-42.65%	-4.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.70%	-42.65%	+31.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.21%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.49%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.84%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.67%	-9.88%	+6.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.48%	-20.93%	+12.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.85%	16.70%	-13.85%

Volatility

SPHB vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) is 11.73%, while YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 17.54%. This indicates that SPHB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPHB	WNTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.73%	17.54%	-5.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.66%	45.99%	-26.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.30%	52.83%	-28.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.72%	53.10%	-25.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.54%	53.10%	-24.56%

SPHB vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPHB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPHB vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

SPHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than WNTR's 96.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SPHB Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF	0.54%	0.60%	0.80%	0.73%	0.72%	0.91%	1.90%	1.26%	1.96%	1.34%	0.93%	1.69%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	96.66%	58.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPHB and WNTR in my portfolio?

SPHB and WNTR have a correlation of -0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPHB or WNTR?

WNTR has higher volatility (17.54%) compared to SPHB (11.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHB dropped -46.84% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

Which ETF is better, SPHB or WNTR?

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 97.02% vs 59.71% for SPHB. On fees, SPHB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, SPHB has been the lower-risk option at 11.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPHB or WNTR?

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 97.02% return vs 59.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPHB or WNTR?

SPHB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPHB or WNTR?

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 96.66%, compared with 0.54% for SPHB.

What is the main difference between SPHB and WNTR?

SPHB is categorized as S&P 500, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SPHB and 1.01% for WNTR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.