SPHB vs. SPVM
SPHB (Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF) and SPVM (Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPHB is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 High Beta Index, while SPVM is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 High Momentum Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPHB returned 19.46%/yr vs 12.34%/yr for SPVM. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPHB charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for SPVM.
Performance
SPHB vs. SPVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPHB achieves a 29.05% return, which is significantly higher than SPVM's 9.93% return. Over the past 10 years, SPHB has outperformed SPVM with an annualized return of 19.46%, while SPVM has yielded a comparatively lower 12.34% annualized return.
SPHB
- 1D
- -4.02%
- 1M
- 6.10%
- YTD
- 29.05%
- 6M
- 26.31%
- 1Y
- 62.78%
- 3Y*
- 28.21%
- 5Y*
- 15.53%
- 10Y*
- 19.46%
SPVM
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 2.61%
- YTD
- 9.93%
- 6M
- 9.00%
- 1Y
- 28.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.25%
- 5Y*
- 11.13%
- 10Y*
- 12.34%
SPHB vs. SPVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPHB Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF | 29.05% | 32.87% | 8.48% | 33.28% | -20.59% | 40.58% | 25.56% | 33.96% | -15.55% | 17.87% |
SPVM Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF | 9.93% | 20.47% | 15.64% | 5.53% | -2.10% | 28.86% | -3.18% | 29.33% | -9.17% | 14.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPHB and SPVM is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2011 | 0.74 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SPHB and SPVM has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SPHB vs. SPVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPHB
SPVM
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Technology
SPHB
SPVM
Industrials
SPHB
SPVM
Financial Services
SPHB
SPVM
Consumer Cyclical
SPHB
SPVM
Healthcare
SPHB
SPVM
Communication Services
SPHB
SPVM
Basic Materials
SPHB
SPVM
Utilities
SPHB
SPVM
Energy
SPHB
SPVM
Consumer Defensive
SPHB
SPVM
Real Estate
SPHB
-
SPVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPHB vs. SPVM — Risk / Return Rank
SPHB
SPVM
SPHB vs. SPVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) and Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPHB | SPVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.44 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.90 | 4.43 | +1.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.17 | 16.80 | +5.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPHB vs. SPVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPHB drawdown since its inception was -46.84%, roughly equal to the maximum SPVM drawdown of -45.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHB and SPVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPHB | SPVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.84% | -45.35% | -1.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.70% | -6.57% | -4.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.21% | -18.66% | -10.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.49% | -19.48% | -12.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.84% | -45.35% | -1.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.02% | -0.87% | -3.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.48% | -4.98% | -3.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 1.73% | +1.11% |
Volatility
SPHB vs. SPVM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) has a higher volatility of 11.78% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM) at 3.27%. This indicates that SPHB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPHB | SPVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.78% | 3.27% | +8.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.72% | 7.72% | +12.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.30% | 11.64% | +12.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.73% | 16.74% | +10.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.54% | 19.56% | +8.98% |
SPHB vs. SPVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPHB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SPVM's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPHB vs. SPVM - Dividend Comparison
SPHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than SPVM's 2.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPHB Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF | 0.54% | 0.60% | 0.80% | 0.73% | 0.72% | 0.91% | 1.90% | 1.26% | 1.96% | 1.34% | 0.93% | 1.69% |
SPVM Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF | 2.02% | 2.02% | 1.91% | 2.45% | 2.33% | 1.41% | 2.11% | 2.40% | 3.10% | 1.68% | 2.80% | 2.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPHB and SPVM have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPHB has higher volatility (11.78%) compared to SPVM (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHB dropped -46.84% vs SPVM's -45.35%.
On 10-year performance, SPHB leads with 19.46% vs 12.34% for SPVM. On fees, SPHB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, SPVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPHB has performed better with a 19.46% return vs 12.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPHB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SPVM.
SPVM has the higher dividend yield at 2.02%, compared with 0.54% for SPHB.
SPHB is categorized as S&P 500, while SPVM is Momentum. SPHB tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index, while SPVM tracks S&P 500 High Momentum Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SPHB and 0.39% for SPVM.
SPHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPHB and SPVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer