PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPHB vs. IDMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPHB vs. IDMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPHB achieves a 19.95% return, which is significantly higher than IDMO's 10.66% return. Over the past 10 years, SPHB has outperformed IDMO with an annualized return of 17.94%, while IDMO has yielded a comparatively lower 12.52% annualized return.


SPHB

1D
0.05%
1M
-5.41%
6M
15.81%
YTD
19.95%
1Y
39.56%
3Y*
21.36%
5Y*
14.83%
10Y*
17.94%
ALL TIME*
13.56%

IDMO

1D
0.10%
1M
0.83%
6M
6.43%
YTD
10.66%
1Y
24.64%
3Y*
25.15%
5Y*
15.47%
10Y*
12.52%
ALL TIME*
9.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$22.05M$20.41M$22.89M
$46.45M$55.30M$54.87M

SPHB vs. IDMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPHB
Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF
19.95%32.87%8.48%33.28%-20.59%40.58%25.56%33.96%-15.55%17.87%
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
10.66%42.17%12.79%20.16%-12.03%14.31%22.01%26.09%-16.66%29.21%

Correlation

The correlation between SPHB and IDMO is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2012

0.49

Over the past year, SPHB and IDMO have become more correlated (0.70) than their long-term average of 0.48, meaning their price movements have been converging.

SPHB vs. IDMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPHB
IDMO

Technology

45.0%
0.5%

Financial Services

14.9%
11.9%

Industrials

13.0%
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
0.0%

Healthcare

5.9%
0.5%

Utilities

3.5%
0.2%

Basic Materials

2.3%
4.7%

Communication Services

1.6%
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

0.9%
0.4%

Energy

0.8%
0.6%

Real Estate

-

0.3%

Technology

SPHB
45.0%
IDMO
0.5%

Financial Services

SPHB
14.9%
IDMO
11.9%

Industrials

SPHB
13.0%
IDMO
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SPHB
10.6%
IDMO
0.0%

Healthcare

SPHB
5.9%
IDMO
0.5%

Utilities

SPHB
3.5%
IDMO
0.2%

Basic Materials

SPHB
2.3%
IDMO
4.7%

Communication Services

SPHB
1.6%
IDMO
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

SPHB
0.9%
IDMO
0.4%

Energy

SPHB
0.8%
IDMO
0.6%

Real Estate

SPHB

-

IDMO
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPHB vs. IDMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPHB
SPHB Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SPHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHB Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHB Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

IDMO
IDMO Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
IDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
IDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPHB vs. IDMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPHBIDMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.23

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

1.95

+0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.86

7.47

+2.39

SPHB vs. IDMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPHB Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the IDMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPHB and IDMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPHB vs. IDMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPHB drawdown since its inception was -46.84%, which is greater than IDMO's maximum drawdown of -39.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHB and IDMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPHBIDMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.84%

-39.38%

-7.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.11%

-12.31%

-1.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.21%

-12.65%

-16.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.49%

-27.07%

-4.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.84%

-31.34%

-15.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.79%

-1.81%

-8.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.47%

-9.68%

+1.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.76%

3.22%

+0.54%

Volatility

SPHB vs. IDMO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) has a higher volatility of 9.30% compared to Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) at 7.12%. This indicates that SPHB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPHBIDMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.30%

7.12%

+2.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.54%

17.57%

+3.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.09%

19.20%

+6.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.84%

18.24%

+9.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.57%

17.97%

+10.60%

SPHB vs. IDMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SPHB and IDMO have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPHB vs. IDMO - Dividend Comparison

SPHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than IDMO's 3.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
3.61%3.71%2.24%2.89%3.66%1.81%1.63%2.78%3.27%3.08%2.18%2.52%
SPHB
Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF
0.58%0.60%0.80%0.73%0.72%0.91%1.90%1.26%1.96%1.34%0.93%1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPHB and IDMO have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPHB has higher volatility (9.30%) compared to IDMO (7.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHB dropped -46.84% vs IDMO's -39.38%.

On 10-year performance, SPHB leads with 17.94% vs 12.52% for IDMO. Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. On volatility, IDMO has been the lower-risk option at 7.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPHB has performed better with a 17.94% return vs 12.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPHB and IDMO have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 3.61%, compared with 0.58% for SPHB.

SPHB is categorized as S&P 500, while IDMO is Momentum. SPHB tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index, while IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index.

SPHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPHB and IDMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer