PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPHB vs. HIBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPHB vs. HIBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPHB achieves a 30.07% return, which is significantly lower than HIBL's 95.37% return.


SPHB

1D
-0.22%
1M
10.26%
YTD
30.07%
6M
30.71%
1Y
68.75%
3Y*
29.70%
5Y*
15.14%
10Y*
18.65%

HIBL

1D
-0.46%
1M
31.17%
YTD
95.37%
6M
95.99%
1Y
276.75%
3Y*
62.38%
5Y*
11.47%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPHB vs. HIBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SPHB
Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF
30.07%32.87%8.48%33.28%-20.59%40.58%25.56%6.99%
HIBL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares
95.37%60.38%-0.40%81.02%-68.24%129.14%-24.96%21.45%

Correlation

The correlation between SPHB and HIBL is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2019

0.99

The correlation between SPHB and HIBL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPHB vs. HIBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPHB
HIBL

Technology

45.8%
45.8%

Consumer Cyclical

12.9%
12.9%

Financial Services

12.5%
12.5%

Industrials

11.7%
11.7%

Basic Materials

4.6%
4.6%

Communication Services

3.7%
3.7%

Utilities

3.2%
3.2%

Healthcare

2.9%
2.9%

Energy

2.2%
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

0.6%
0.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

SPHB
45.8%
HIBL
45.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SPHB
12.9%
HIBL
12.9%

Financial Services

SPHB
12.5%
HIBL
12.5%

Industrials

SPHB
11.7%
HIBL
11.7%

Basic Materials

SPHB
4.6%
HIBL
4.6%

Communication Services

SPHB
3.7%
HIBL
3.7%

Utilities

SPHB
3.2%
HIBL
3.2%

Healthcare

SPHB
2.9%
HIBL
2.9%

Energy

SPHB
2.2%
HIBL
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

SPHB
0.6%
HIBL
0.6%

Real Estate

SPHB

-

HIBL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPHB vs. HIBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPHB
SPHB Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
SPHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHB Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHB Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

HIBL
HIBL Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
HIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
HIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPHB vs. HIBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPHBHIBLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.46

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.46

8.88

-2.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.68

32.55

-6.87

SPHB vs. HIBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPHB Sharpe Ratio is 3.13, which is comparable to the HIBL Sharpe Ratio of 4.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPHB and HIBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPHBHIBLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.13

4.23

-1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.14

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.24

+0.28

Drawdowns

SPHB vs. HIBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPHB drawdown since its inception was -46.84%, smaller than the maximum HIBL drawdown of -88.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHB and HIBL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPHBHIBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.84%

-88.27%

+41.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.70%

-31.39%

+20.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.21%

-69.66%

+40.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.49%

-81.58%

+50.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.88%

-2.70%

+1.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.50%

-44.17%

+35.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

8.55%

-5.86%

Volatility

SPHB vs. HIBL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) is 7.08%, while Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) has a volatility of 21.02%. This indicates that SPHB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HIBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPHBHIBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.08%

21.02%

-13.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.98%

50.42%

-33.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.09%

65.96%

-43.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.38%

82.15%

-54.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.44%

91.87%

-63.43%

SPHB vs. HIBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPHB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than HIBL's 1.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPHB vs. HIBL - Dividend Comparison

SPHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than HIBL's 1.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HIBL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares
1.18%2.43%0.82%0.69%0.00%0.06%0.19%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPHB
Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF
0.52%0.60%0.80%0.73%0.72%0.91%1.90%1.26%1.96%1.34%0.93%1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, SPHB and HIBL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

HIBL has higher volatility (21.02%) compared to SPHB (7.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHB dropped -46.84% vs HIBL's -88.27%.

On 5-year performance, SPHB leads with 15.14% vs 11.47% for HIBL. On fees, SPHB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, SPHB has been the lower-risk option at 7.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPHB has performed better with a 15.14% return vs 11.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPHB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.12% for HIBL.

HIBL has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 0.52% for SPHB.

SPHB is categorized as S&P 500, while HIBL is Leveraged Equities. SPHB tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index, while HIBL tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SPHB and 1.12% for HIBL.

HIBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.23 vs 3.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPHB and HIBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer