SPGP vs. XCLR
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF (SPGP) and Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR).
SPGP and XCLR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SPGP is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 GARP Index. It was launched on Jun 16, 2011. XCLR is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 3-Month Collar 95-110 Index. It was launched on Aug 25, 2021. Both SPGP and XCLR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SPGP vs. XCLR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SPGP vs. XCLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPGP Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF | -5.19% | 9.80% | 8.48% | 20.29% | -13.83% | 6.21% |
XCLR Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF | -5.35% | 10.25% | 20.67% | 15.64% | -12.93% | 3.44% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SPGP having a -5.19% return and XCLR slightly lower at -5.35%.
SPGP
- 1D
- 3.24%
- 1M
- -6.43%
- YTD
- -5.19%
- 6M
- -4.81%
- 1Y
- 8.81%
- 3Y*
- 9.45%
- 5Y*
- 6.73%
- 10Y*
- 13.70%
XCLR
- 1D
- 1.50%
- 1M
- -5.30%
- YTD
- -5.35%
- 6M
- -3.90%
- 1Y
- 10.04%
- 3Y*
- 12.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SPGP vs. XCLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPGP has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than XCLR's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SPGP vs. XCLR — Risk / Return Rank
SPGP
XCLR
SPGP vs. XCLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF (SPGP) and Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPGP | XCLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.41 | 0.96 | -0.55 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.74 | 1.39 | -0.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.18 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.65 | 1.27 | -0.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.64 | 5.31 | -2.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPGP | XCLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 | 0.96 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.58 | +0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between SPGP and XCLR is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SPGP vs. XCLR - Dividend Comparison
SPGP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than XCLR's 13.90% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPGP Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF | 0.98% | 1.04% | 1.38% | 1.24% | 1.22% | 0.69% | 1.10% | 0.86% | 0.95% | 0.68% | 0.89% | 1.12% |
XCLR Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF | 13.90% | 13.15% | 18.76% | 1.40% | 1.01% | 1.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SPGP vs. XCLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPGP drawdown since its inception was -42.08%, which is greater than XCLR's maximum drawdown of -14.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPGP and XCLR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPGP | XCLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.08% | -14.63% | -27.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.00% | -8.29% | -6.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.27% | -6.91% | -1.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.39% | -4.82% | +0.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.68% | 1.98% | +1.70% |
Volatility
SPGP vs. XCLR - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF (SPGP) has a higher volatility of 6.32% compared to Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR) at 3.39%. This indicates that SPGP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SPGP | XCLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.32% | 3.39% | +2.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.82% | 7.15% | +4.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.82% | 10.52% | +11.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.49% | 10.58% | +7.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.17% | 10.58% | +10.59% |