SPGP vs. VT
SPGP (Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPGP is a Multi-factor fund tracking the S&P 500 GARP Index, while VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPGP returned 15.11%/yr vs 12.93%/yr for VT. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPGP charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.
Performance
SPGP vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPGP achieves a 6.06% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 11.06% return. Over the past 10 years, SPGP has outperformed VT with an annualized return of 15.11%, while VT has yielded a comparatively lower 12.93% annualized return.
SPGP
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 3.81%
- YTD
- 6.06%
- 6M
- 5.64%
- 1Y
- 16.85%
- 3Y*
- 11.97%
- 5Y*
- 7.97%
- 10Y*
- 15.11%
VT
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 1.80%
- YTD
- 11.06%
- 6M
- 11.82%
- 1Y
- 27.43%
- 3Y*
- 19.71%
- 5Y*
- 10.65%
- 10Y*
- 12.93%
SPGP vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPGP Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF | 6.06% | 9.80% | 8.48% | 20.29% | -13.83% | 35.72% | 15.92% | 39.16% | 1.68% | 36.24% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 11.06% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 16.59% | 26.81% | -9.76% | 24.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPGP and VT is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2011 | 0.82 |
The correlation between SPGP and VT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPGP vs. VT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPGP
VT
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Energy
Healthcare
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Technology
SPGP
VT
Financial Services
SPGP
VT
Consumer Cyclical
SPGP
VT
Industrials
SPGP
VT
Communication Services
SPGP
VT
Energy
SPGP
VT
Healthcare
SPGP
VT
Real Estate
SPGP
VT
Basic Materials
SPGP
-
VT
Consumer Defensive
SPGP
-
VT
Utilities
SPGP
-
VT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPGP vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank
SPGP
VT
SPGP vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF (SPGP) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPGP | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.35 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | 2.68 | -1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.54 | 11.67 | -6.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPGP vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPGP drawdown since its inception was -42.08%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPGP and VT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPGP | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.08% | -50.27% | +8.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.15% | -9.67% | -1.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.87% | -16.51% | -6.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.87% | -26.38% | +3.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.08% | -34.24% | -7.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | -1.92% | +0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.35% | -7.01% | +2.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 2.22% | +0.70% |
Volatility
SPGP vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF (SPGP) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) have volatilities of 5.43% and 5.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPGP | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.43% | 5.26% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.24% | 11.01% | +1.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.63% | 13.38% | +2.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.60% | 16.15% | +2.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.23% | 17.27% | +3.96% |
SPGP vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPGP has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPGP vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
SPGP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than VT's 1.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPGP Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF | 0.88% | 1.04% | 1.38% | 1.24% | 1.22% | 0.69% | 1.10% | 0.86% | 0.95% | 0.68% | 0.89% | 1.12% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.61% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPGP and VT have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPGP has higher volatility (5.43%) compared to VT (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPGP dropped -42.08% vs VT's -50.27%.
On 10-year performance, SPGP leads with 15.11% vs 12.93% for VT. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VT has been the lower-risk option at 5.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPGP has performed better with a 15.11% return vs 12.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for SPGP.
VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 0.88% for SPGP.
SPGP is categorized as Multi-factor, while VT is Global Equities. SPGP tracks S&P 500 GARP Index, while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for SPGP and 0.06% for VT.
VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPGP and VT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer