PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPGP vs. SPYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPGP vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF (SPGP) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPGP achieves a 6.12% return, which is significantly lower than SPYM's 10.98% return. Over the past 10 years, SPGP has underperformed SPYM with an annualized return of 14.80%, while SPYM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.62% annualized return.


SPGP

1D
-0.56%
1M
3.93%
YTD
6.12%
6M
6.65%
1Y
17.19%
3Y*
12.90%
5Y*
7.90%
10Y*
14.80%

SPYM

1D
-0.66%
1M
5.06%
YTD
10.98%
6M
10.98%
1Y
28.09%
3Y*
22.46%
5Y*
13.91%
10Y*
15.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPGP vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPGP
Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF
6.12%9.80%8.48%20.29%-13.83%35.72%15.92%39.16%1.68%36.24%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
10.98%17.79%25.00%26.24%-18.09%28.78%18.49%31.99%-4.78%21.30%

Correlation

The correlation between SPGP and SPYM is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2011

0.81

The correlation between SPGP and SPYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPGP vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPGP
SPYM

Technology

22.8%
38.5%

Financial Services

22.2%
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

18.0%
9.9%

Industrials

16.8%
7.6%

Energy

7.1%
3.2%

Communication Services

6.6%
10.6%

Healthcare

3.8%
8.4%

Real Estate

2.7%
1.8%

Basic Materials

-

1.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.6%

Utilities

-

2.5%

Technology

SPGP
22.8%
SPYM
38.5%

Financial Services

SPGP
22.2%
SPYM
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SPGP
18.0%
SPYM
9.9%

Industrials

SPGP
16.8%
SPYM
7.6%

Energy

SPGP
7.1%
SPYM
3.2%

Communication Services

SPGP
6.6%
SPYM
10.6%

Healthcare

SPGP
3.8%
SPYM
8.4%

Real Estate

SPGP
2.7%
SPYM
1.8%

Basic Materials

SPGP

-

SPYM
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

SPGP

-

SPYM
4.6%

Utilities

SPGP

-

SPYM
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPGP vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPGP
SPGP Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
SPGP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPGP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPGP Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
SPGP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPGP Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYM
SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPGP vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF (SPGP) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPGPSPYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.44

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

3.17

-1.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.94

14.76

-8.81

SPGP vs. SPYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPGP Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the SPYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPGP and SPYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPGPSPYMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14

2.39

-1.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.83

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.87

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.62

+0.12

Drawdowns

SPGP vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPGP drawdown since its inception was -42.08%, smaller than the maximum SPYM drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPGP and SPYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPGPSPYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.08%

-54.46%

+12.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.15%

-8.90%

-2.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.87%

-18.72%

-4.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.87%

-24.48%

+1.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.08%

-33.87%

-8.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

-0.66%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.36%

-7.15%

+2.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

1.91%

+0.99%

Volatility

SPGP vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF (SPGP) has a higher volatility of 3.74% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) at 2.83%. This indicates that SPGP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPGPSPYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

2.83%

+0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.57%

8.90%

+2.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.13%

11.80%

+3.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.51%

16.80%

+1.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.20%

18.00%

+3.20%

SPGP vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPGP has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPGP vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison

SPGP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than SPYM's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPGP
Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF
0.88%1.04%1.38%1.24%1.22%0.69%1.10%0.86%0.95%0.68%0.89%1.12%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
1.00%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.79%2.23%1.75%1.97%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPGP and SPYM have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPGP has higher volatility (3.74%) compared to SPYM (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPGP dropped -42.08% vs SPYM's -54.46%.

On 10-year performance, SPYM leads with 15.62% vs 14.80% for SPGP. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 15.62% return vs 14.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for SPGP.

SPYM has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.88% for SPGP.

SPGP tracks S&P 500 GARP Index, while SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for SPGP and 0.02% for SPYM.

SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPGP and SPYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer