PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPGP vs. SPGM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPGP vs. SPGM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF (SPGP) and SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPGP achieves a 5.38% return, which is significantly lower than SPGM's 10.79% return. Over the past 10 years, SPGP has outperformed SPGM with an annualized return of 15.37%, while SPGM has yielded a comparatively lower 13.23% annualized return.


SPGP

1D
-0.40%
1M
1.15%
YTD
5.38%
6M
3.93%
1Y
15.59%
3Y*
12.41%
5Y*
7.93%
10Y*
15.37%

SPGM

1D
-1.85%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
10.79%
6M
9.88%
1Y
28.37%
3Y*
20.39%
5Y*
11.06%
10Y*
13.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPGP vs. SPGM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPGP
Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF
5.38%9.80%8.48%20.29%-13.83%35.72%15.92%39.16%1.68%36.24%
SPGM
SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF
10.79%23.62%16.75%21.34%-17.53%21.13%15.28%26.58%-10.12%23.26%

Correlation

The correlation between SPGP and SPGM is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2012

0.74

The correlation between SPGP and SPGM shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (all time) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPGP vs. SPGM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPGP
SPGM

Technology

24.9%
30.7%

Financial Services

20.9%
15.7%

Consumer Cyclical

17.6%
9.0%

Industrials

16.9%
12.5%

Communication Services

6.8%
8.2%

Energy

6.3%
4.0%

Healthcare

3.7%
7.9%

Real Estate

2.9%
1.8%

Basic Materials

-

3.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.5%

Utilities

-

2.0%

Technology

SPGP
24.9%
SPGM
30.7%

Financial Services

SPGP
20.9%
SPGM
15.7%

Consumer Cyclical

SPGP
17.6%
SPGM
9.0%

Industrials

SPGP
16.9%
SPGM
12.5%

Communication Services

SPGP
6.8%
SPGM
8.2%

Energy

SPGP
6.3%
SPGM
4.0%

Healthcare

SPGP
3.7%
SPGM
7.9%

Real Estate

SPGP
2.9%
SPGM
1.8%

Basic Materials

SPGP

-

SPGM
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

SPGP

-

SPGM
4.5%

Utilities

SPGP

-

SPGM
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPGP vs. SPGM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPGP
SPGP Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
SPGP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPGP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPGP Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
SPGP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPGP Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

SPGM
SPGM Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SPGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPGM Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
SPGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPGM Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPGP vs. SPGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF (SPGP) and SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPGPSPGMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.38

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

3.00

-1.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.34

13.18

-7.84

SPGP vs. SPGM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPGP Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is lower than the SPGM Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPGP and SPGM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPGP vs. SPGM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPGP drawdown since its inception was -42.08%, which is greater than SPGM's maximum drawdown of -33.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPGP and SPGM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPGPSPGMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.08%

-33.97%

-8.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.15%

-9.50%

-1.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.87%

-16.90%

-5.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.87%

-25.93%

+3.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.08%

-33.97%

-8.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.69%

-2.70%

+1.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.35%

-4.79%

+0.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.92%

2.16%

+0.76%

Volatility

SPGP vs. SPGM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF (SPGP) and SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) have volatilities of 5.41% and 5.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPGPSPGMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.41%

5.64%

-0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.33%

11.44%

+0.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.77%

13.74%

+2.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.62%

16.16%

+2.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.22%

17.50%

+3.72%

SPGP vs. SPGM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPGP has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than SPGM's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPGP vs. SPGM - Dividend Comparison

SPGP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than SPGM's 1.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPGM
SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF
1.83%1.89%1.98%2.09%2.37%1.94%1.45%2.46%1.89%2.29%1.87%3.70%
SPGP
Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF
0.85%1.04%1.38%1.24%1.22%0.69%1.10%0.86%0.95%0.68%0.89%1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPGP and SPGM have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPGM has higher volatility (5.64%) compared to SPGP (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPGP dropped -42.08% vs SPGM's -33.97%.

On 10-year performance, SPGP leads with 15.37% vs 13.23% for SPGM. On fees, SPGM is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPGP has been the lower-risk option at 5.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPGP has performed better with a 15.37% return vs 13.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPGM is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for SPGP.

SPGM has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 0.85% for SPGP.

SPGP is categorized as Multi-factor, while SPGM is Global Equities. SPGP tracks S&P 500 GARP Index, while SPGM tracks MSCI ACWI IMI Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for SPGP and 0.09% for SPGM.

SPGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPGP and SPGM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer