PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPGP vs. QQQM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPGP vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF (SPGP) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPGP achieves a 6.12% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 21.39% return.


SPGP

1D
-0.56%
1M
3.93%
YTD
6.12%
6M
6.65%
1Y
17.19%
3Y*
12.90%
5Y*
7.90%
10Y*
14.80%

QQQM

1D
-0.20%
1M
10.67%
YTD
21.39%
6M
19.75%
1Y
41.98%
3Y*
28.89%
5Y*
18.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPGP vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SPGP
Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF
6.12%9.80%8.48%20.29%-13.83%35.72%14.38%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
21.39%20.85%25.68%55.01%-32.52%27.45%6.67%

Correlation

The correlation between SPGP and QQQM is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020

0.75

The correlation between SPGP and QQQM shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (3 years) to 0.76 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPGP vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPGP
QQQM

Technology

22.8%
53.8%

Financial Services

22.2%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

18.0%
12.3%

Industrials

16.8%
2.8%

Energy

7.1%
0.6%

Communication Services

6.6%
15.8%

Healthcare

3.8%
4.2%

Real Estate

2.7%
0.1%

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Technology

SPGP
22.8%
QQQM
53.8%

Financial Services

SPGP
22.2%
QQQM
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SPGP
18.0%
QQQM
12.3%

Industrials

SPGP
16.8%
QQQM
2.8%

Energy

SPGP
7.1%
QQQM
0.6%

Communication Services

SPGP
6.6%
QQQM
15.8%

Healthcare

SPGP
3.8%
QQQM
4.2%

Real Estate

SPGP
2.7%
QQQM
0.1%

Basic Materials

SPGP

-

QQQM
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

SPGP

-

QQQM
7.7%

Utilities

SPGP

-

QQQM
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPGP vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPGP
SPGP Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
SPGP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPGP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPGP Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
SPGP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPGP Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQM
QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPGP vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF (SPGP) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPGPQQQMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.45

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

3.53

-1.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.94

13.52

-7.57

SPGP vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPGP Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPGP and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPGPQQQMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14

2.65

-1.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.82

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.85

-0.11

Drawdowns

SPGP vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPGP drawdown since its inception was -42.08%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPGP and QQQM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPGPQQQMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.08%

-35.04%

-7.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.15%

-11.96%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.87%

-22.70%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.87%

-35.04%

+12.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

-0.20%

-0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.36%

-8.25%

+3.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

3.11%

-0.21%

Volatility

SPGP vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF (SPGP) is 3.74%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that SPGP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPGPQQQMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

4.48%

-0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.57%

12.05%

-0.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.13%

15.91%

-0.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.51%

22.24%

-3.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.20%

22.12%

-0.92%

SPGP vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPGP has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPGP vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

SPGP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, more than QQQM's 0.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.41%0.50%0.61%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPGP
Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF
0.88%1.04%1.38%1.24%1.22%0.69%1.10%0.86%0.95%0.68%0.89%1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPGP and QQQM have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQM has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to SPGP (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPGP dropped -42.08% vs QQQM's -35.04%.

On 5-year performance, QQQM leads with 18.07% vs 7.90% for SPGP. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SPGP has been the lower-risk option at 3.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 18.07% return vs 7.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for SPGP.

SPGP has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.41% for QQQM.

SPGP is categorized as S&P 500, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. SPGP tracks S&P 500 GARP Index, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for SPGP and 0.15% for QQQM.

QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPGP and QQQM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer