PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPGM vs. VEU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPGM vs. VEU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) and Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPGM achieves a 12.88% return, which is significantly lower than VEU's 14.60% return. Over the past 10 years, SPGM has outperformed VEU with an annualized return of 12.95%, while VEU has yielded a comparatively lower 9.94% annualized return.


SPGM

1D
-0.87%
1M
4.94%
YTD
12.88%
6M
13.62%
1Y
31.70%
3Y*
21.46%
5Y*
11.48%
10Y*
12.95%

VEU

1D
-0.98%
1M
5.07%
YTD
14.60%
6M
17.34%
1Y
32.37%
3Y*
19.62%
5Y*
8.67%
10Y*
9.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPGM vs. VEU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPGM
SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF
12.88%23.62%16.75%21.34%-17.53%21.13%15.28%26.58%-10.12%23.26%
VEU
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF
14.60%32.35%5.56%15.84%-15.58%8.27%11.10%21.83%-14.18%27.40%

Correlation

The correlation between SPGM and VEU is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2012

0.78

The correlation between SPGM and VEU shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (all time) to 0.92 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPGM vs. VEU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPGM
VEU

Technology

27.4%
18.5%

Financial Services

16.4%
23.3%

Industrials

13.1%
15.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
8.2%

Communication Services

8.5%
4.6%

Healthcare

8.2%
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
5.1%

Energy

4.5%
5.2%

Basic Materials

3.9%
7.1%

Utilities

2.2%
3.2%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.0%

Technology

SPGM
27.4%
VEU
18.5%

Financial Services

SPGM
16.4%
VEU
23.3%

Industrials

SPGM
13.1%
VEU
15.7%

Consumer Cyclical

SPGM
9.2%
VEU
8.2%

Communication Services

SPGM
8.5%
VEU
4.6%

Healthcare

SPGM
8.2%
VEU
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

SPGM
4.8%
VEU
5.1%

Energy

SPGM
4.5%
VEU
5.2%

Basic Materials

SPGM
3.9%
VEU
7.1%

Utilities

SPGM
2.2%
VEU
3.2%

Real Estate

SPGM
1.9%
VEU
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPGM vs. VEU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPGM
SPGM Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SPGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPGM Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
SPGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPGM Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

VEU
VEU Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEU Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
VEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEU Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPGM vs. VEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) and Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPGMVEUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.47

2.13

+0.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.39

2.94

+0.45

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.39

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

2.85

+0.51

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.14

11.06

+4.08

SPGM vs. VEU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPGM Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the VEU Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPGM and VEU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPGMVEUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

2.13

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.54

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.58

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.25

+0.40

Drawdowns

SPGM vs. VEU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPGM drawdown since its inception was -33.97%, smaller than the maximum VEU drawdown of -61.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPGM and VEU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPGMVEUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.97%

-61.52%

+27.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.50%

-11.43%

+1.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.90%

-13.69%

-3.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.93%

-29.31%

+3.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.97%

-34.98%

+1.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

-0.98%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.81%

-13.13%

+8.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

2.93%

-0.83%

Volatility

SPGM vs. VEU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) is 3.92%, while Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU) has a volatility of 5.59%. This indicates that SPGM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPGMVEUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.92%

5.59%

-1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.35%

13.04%

-2.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.88%

15.29%

-2.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.03%

16.07%

-0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.57%

17.21%

+0.36%

SPGM vs. VEU - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPGM has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VEU's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPGM vs. VEU - Dividend Comparison

SPGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, less than VEU's 2.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPGM
SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF
1.79%1.89%1.98%2.09%2.37%1.94%1.45%2.46%1.89%2.29%1.87%3.70%
VEU
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF
2.61%3.09%3.24%3.32%3.12%3.08%2.00%3.10%3.27%2.66%2.96%2.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, SPGM and VEU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VEU has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to SPGM (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPGM dropped -33.97% vs VEU's -61.52%.

On 10-year performance, SPGM leads with 12.95% vs 9.94% for VEU. On fees, VEU is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPGM has been the lower-risk option at 3.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPGM has performed better with a 12.95% return vs 9.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEU is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for SPGM.

VEU has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 1.79% for SPGM.

SPGM is categorized as Global Equities, while VEU is Foreign Large Cap Equities. SPGM tracks MSCI AC World IMI, while VEU tracks FTSE All-World ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPGM and 0.04% for VEU.

SPGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPGM and VEU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer