PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPGI vs. ICE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SPGI vs. ICE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in S&P Global Inc. (SPGI) and Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPGI achieves a -19.47% return, which is significantly lower than ICE's -12.95% return. Over the past 10 years, SPGI has outperformed ICE with an annualized return of 15.70%, while ICE has yielded a comparatively lower 11.91% annualized return.


SPGI

1D
1.35%
1M
3.28%
YTD
-19.47%
6M
-16.00%
1Y
-16.50%
3Y*
3.19%
5Y*
2.16%
10Y*
15.70%

ICE

1D
1.12%
1M
-9.22%
YTD
-12.95%
6M
-13.36%
1Y
-20.60%
3Y*
10.22%
5Y*
5.87%
10Y*
11.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPGI vs. ICE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPGI
S&P Global Inc.
-19.47%5.71%13.94%32.79%-28.38%44.68%21.40%62.27%1.37%59.32%
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
-12.95%9.92%17.46%27.12%-23.91%19.94%26.15%24.47%8.11%26.60%

Correlation

The correlation between SPGI and ICE is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2005

0.44

The correlation between SPGI and ICE shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (all time) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SPGI:

$124.67B

ICE:

$80.10B

EPS

SPGI:

$15.79

ICE:

$6.85

PE Ratio

SPGI:

26.53

ICE:

20.53

PEG Ratio

SPGI:

3.47

ICE:

2.48

PS Ratio

SPGI:

8.06

ICE:

6.15

PB Ratio

SPGI:

3.98

ICE:

2.71

Total Revenue (TTM)

SPGI:

$15.73B

ICE:

$13.08B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SPGI:

$8.15B

ICE:

$8.93B

EBITDA (TTM)

SPGI:

$7.83B

ICE:

$7.05B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPGI vs. ICE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPGI
SPGI Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
SPGI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPGI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPGI Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
SPGI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPGI Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

ICE
ICE Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
ICE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
ICE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICE Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPGI vs. ICE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for S&P Global Inc. (SPGI) and Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPGIICEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

0.85

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.54

-0.80

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.03

-1.50

+0.47

SPGI vs. ICE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPGI Sharpe Ratio is -0.60, which is higher than the ICE Sharpe Ratio of -0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPGI and ICE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPGI vs. ICE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPGI drawdown since its inception was -74.67%, roughly equal to the maximum ICE drawdown of -73.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPGI and ICE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPGIICEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.67%

-73.94%

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.48%

-25.87%

-4.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.48%

-25.87%

-4.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.76%

-34.32%

-5.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.76%

-34.32%

-5.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.12%

-24.75%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.23%

-16.46%

+1.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.07%

13.74%

+2.33%

Volatility

SPGI vs. ICE - Volatility Comparison

S&P Global Inc. (SPGI) has a higher volatility of 7.62% compared to Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) at 6.26%. This indicates that SPGI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPGIICEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.62%

6.26%

+1.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.13%

18.52%

+5.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.63%

21.86%

+5.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.51%

21.07%

+3.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.03%

22.20%

+3.83%

Dividends

SPGI vs. ICE - Dividend Comparison

SPGI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than ICE's 1.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
1.39%1.19%1.21%1.31%1.48%0.97%1.04%1.19%1.27%1.13%1.21%1.13%
SPGI
S&P Global Inc.
0.92%0.73%0.73%0.82%0.99%0.65%0.82%0.84%1.18%0.97%1.34%1.34%

Financials

SPGI vs. ICE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between S&P Global Inc. and Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B4.00B20222023202420252026
4.17B
3.67B
(SPGI) Total Revenue
(ICE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SPGI vs. ICE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between S&P Global Inc. and Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%202220232024202520260
78.8%
Portfolio components
SPGI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, S&P Global Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ICE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.89B and revenue of 3.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.8%.

SPGI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, S&P Global Inc. reported an operating income of 2.00B and revenue of 4.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 48.0%.

ICE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.67B and revenue of 3.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 45.4%.

SPGI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, S&P Global Inc. reported a net income of 1.40B and revenue of 4.17B, resulting in a net margin of 33.5%.

ICE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. reported a net income of 1.41B and revenue of 3.67B, resulting in a net margin of 38.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SPGI and ICE have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPGI has higher volatility (7.62%) compared to ICE (6.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPGI dropped -74.67% vs ICE's -73.94%.

SPGI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.60 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPGI and ICE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer