SPEM vs. XLP
SPEM (SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF) and XLP (State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the S&P Emerging Markets BMI, while XLP is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Consumer Staples Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPEM returned 9.63%/yr vs 7.60%/yr for XLP. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPEM charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLP.
Performance
SPEM vs. XLP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SPEM having a 11.32% return and XLP slightly lower at 11.10%. Over the past 10 years, SPEM has outperformed XLP with an annualized return of 9.63%, while XLP has yielded a comparatively lower 7.60% annualized return.
SPEM
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 2.50%
- YTD
- 11.32%
- 6M
- 13.11%
- 1Y
- 27.73%
- 3Y*
- 17.37%
- 5Y*
- 5.60%
- 10Y*
- 9.63%
XLP
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 1.39%
- YTD
- 11.10%
- 6M
- 9.54%
- 1Y
- 8.93%
- 3Y*
- 8.26%
- 5Y*
- 6.65%
- 10Y*
- 7.60%
SPEM vs. XLP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPEM SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF | 11.32% | 25.63% | 11.40% | 10.51% | -17.90% | 1.51% | 14.55% | 19.69% | -13.26% | 34.82% |
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 11.10% | 1.52% | 12.20% | -0.82% | -0.81% | 17.20% | 10.11% | 27.43% | -8.07% | 12.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPEM and XLP is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2007 | 0.45 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SPEM and XLP has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SPEM vs. XLP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPEM
XLP
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
SPEM
XLP
-
Financial Services
SPEM
XLP
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPEM
XLP
Industrials
SPEM
XLP
-
Basic Materials
SPEM
XLP
-
Communication Services
SPEM
XLP
-
Energy
SPEM
XLP
-
Healthcare
SPEM
XLP
-
Consumer Defensive
SPEM
XLP
Utilities
SPEM
XLP
-
Real Estate
SPEM
XLP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPEM vs. XLP — Risk / Return Rank
SPEM
XLP
SPEM vs. XLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPEM | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.11 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 0.79 | +1.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.16 | 1.52 | +6.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPEM vs. XLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPEM drawdown since its inception was -64.41%, which is greater than XLP's maximum drawdown of -35.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPEM and XLP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPEM | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.41% | -35.90% | -28.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.36% | -9.69% | -1.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.62% | -12.39% | -5.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.75% | -16.30% | -15.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.06% | -24.51% | -11.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.40% | -4.12% | +1.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.73% | -7.06% | -7.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | 5.01% | -1.84% |
Volatility
SPEM vs. XLP - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) has a higher volatility of 6.87% compared to State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) at 4.53%. This indicates that SPEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPEM | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.87% | 4.53% | +2.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.21% | 10.14% | +4.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.67% | 12.90% | +3.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.26% | 13.34% | +3.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.83% | 14.75% | +4.08% |
SPEM vs. XLP - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPEM has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is higher than XLP's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPEM vs. XLP - Dividend Comparison
SPEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, less than XLP's 2.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPEM SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF | 2.49% | 2.77% | 2.78% | 2.80% | 3.38% | 3.14% | 1.92% | 2.94% | 2.34% | 1.12% | 1.51% | 2.40% |
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.53% | 2.75% | 2.77% | 2.63% | 2.47% | 2.28% | 2.50% | 2.57% | 3.04% | 2.62% | 2.53% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPEM and XLP have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPEM has higher volatility (6.87%) compared to XLP (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPEM dropped -64.41% vs XLP's -35.90%.
On 10-year performance, SPEM leads with 9.63% vs 7.60% for XLP. On fees, XLP is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLP has been the lower-risk option at 4.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPEM has performed better with a 9.63% return vs 7.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLP is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.11% for SPEM.
XLP has the higher dividend yield at 2.53%, compared with 2.49% for SPEM.
SPEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while XLP is Consumer Staples Equities. SPEM tracks S&P Emerging Markets BMI, while XLP tracks Consumer Staples Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for SPEM and 0.08% for XLP.
SPEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPEM and XLP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer