SPEM vs. WPM
SPEM (SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF) is Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the S&P Emerging Markets BMI, while WPM (Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, SPEM returned 9.63%/yr vs 20.59%/yr for WPM. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SPEM vs. WPM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPEM achieves a 11.32% return, which is significantly higher than WPM's -0.90% return. Over the past 10 years, SPEM has underperformed WPM with an annualized return of 9.63%, while WPM has yielded a comparatively higher 20.59% annualized return.
SPEM
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 2.50%
- YTD
- 11.32%
- 6M
- 13.11%
- 1Y
- 27.73%
- 3Y*
- 17.37%
- 5Y*
- 5.60%
- 10Y*
- 9.63%
WPM
- 1D
- 3.05%
- 1M
- -10.84%
- YTD
- -0.90%
- 6M
- -0.91%
- 1Y
- 27.43%
- 3Y*
- 38.53%
- 5Y*
- 20.71%
- 10Y*
- 20.59%
SPEM vs. WPM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPEM SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF | 11.32% | 25.63% | 11.40% | 10.51% | -17.90% | 1.51% | 14.55% | 19.69% | -13.26% | 34.82% |
WPM Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. | -0.90% | 110.52% | 15.24% | 27.91% | -7.53% | 4.22% | 41.82% | 54.62% | -10.04% | 16.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPEM and WPM is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.31 |
The correlation between SPEM and WPM shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (all time) to 0.42 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPEM vs. WPM — Risk / Return Rank
SPEM
WPM
SPEM vs. WPM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPEM | WPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.14 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 0.84 | +1.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.16 | 2.40 | +5.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPEM vs. WPM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPEM drawdown since its inception was -64.41%, which is greater than WPM's maximum drawdown of -48.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPEM and WPM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPEM | WPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.41% | -48.64% | -15.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.36% | -34.92% | +23.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.62% | -34.92% | +17.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.75% | -43.29% | +11.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.06% | -48.64% | +12.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.40% | -29.73% | +27.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.73% | -18.87% | +4.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | 12.22% | -9.05% |
Volatility
SPEM vs. WPM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) is 6.87%, while Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM) has a volatility of 16.76%. This indicates that SPEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WPM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPEM | WPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.87% | 16.76% | -9.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.21% | 39.19% | -24.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.67% | 45.96% | -29.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.26% | 35.44% | -18.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.83% | 36.78% | -17.95% |
Dividends
SPEM vs. WPM - Dividend Comparison
SPEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, more than WPM's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPEM SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF | 2.49% | 2.77% | 2.78% | 2.80% | 3.38% | 3.14% | 1.92% | 2.94% | 2.34% | 1.12% | 1.51% | 2.40% |
WPM Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. | 0.62% | 0.56% | 1.10% | 1.22% | 1.54% | 1.33% | 1.01% | 1.21% | 1.84% | 1.49% | 1.09% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPEM and WPM have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WPM has higher volatility (16.76%) compared to SPEM (6.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPEM dropped -64.41% vs WPM's -48.64%.
SPEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPEM and WPM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer