PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPEM vs. SPYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPEM vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPEM achieves a 10.33% return, which is significantly lower than SPYM's 11.77% return. Over the past 10 years, SPEM has underperformed SPYM with an annualized return of 8.32%, while SPYM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.21% annualized return.


SPEM

1D
0.39%
1M
0.02%
6M
4.39%
YTD
10.33%
1Y
22.62%
3Y*
16.30%
5Y*
6.50%
10Y*
8.32%
ALL TIME*
5.56%

SPYM

1D
1.47%
1M
1.73%
6M
9.55%
YTD
11.77%
1Y
23.31%
3Y*
20.83%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
15.21%
ALL TIME*
11.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$92.35M$109.23M$122.58M
$833.33M$955.26M$1.11B

SPEM vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
10.33%25.63%11.40%10.51%-17.90%1.51%14.55%19.69%-13.26%34.82%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
11.77%17.79%25.00%26.24%-18.09%28.78%18.49%31.99%-4.78%21.30%

Correlation

The correlation between SPEM and SPYM is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2007

0.67

The correlation between SPEM and SPYM shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (5 years) to 0.78 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPEM vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPEM
SPYM

Technology

32.7%
38.5%

Financial Services

19.9%
11.6%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
9.5%

Industrials

8.3%
8.4%

Basic Materials

7.7%
1.7%

Communication Services

6.6%
9.9%

Healthcare

3.9%
8.9%

Energy

3.8%
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
4.5%

Utilities

2.7%
2.2%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

SPEM
32.7%
SPYM
38.5%

Financial Services

SPEM
19.9%
SPYM
11.6%

Consumer Cyclical

SPEM
8.9%
SPYM
9.5%

Industrials

SPEM
8.3%
SPYM
8.4%

Basic Materials

SPEM
7.7%
SPYM
1.7%

Communication Services

SPEM
6.6%
SPYM
9.9%

Healthcare

SPEM
3.9%
SPYM
8.9%

Energy

SPEM
3.8%
SPYM
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

SPEM
3.7%
SPYM
4.5%

Utilities

SPEM
2.7%
SPYM
2.2%

Real Estate

SPEM
1.8%
SPYM
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPEM vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPEM
SPEM Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SPEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPEM Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SPEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPEM Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYM
SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPEM vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPEMSPYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.33

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.00

2.63

-0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.59

11.23

-4.64

SPEM vs. SPYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the SPYM Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPEM and SPYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPEM vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPEM drawdown since its inception was -64.41%, which is greater than SPYM's maximum drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPEM and SPYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPEMSPYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.41%

-54.46%

-9.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.36%

-8.90%

-2.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.62%

-18.72%

+1.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.03%

-24.48%

-5.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.06%

-33.87%

-2.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.76%

0.00%

-3.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.65%

-7.11%

-7.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

2.08%

+1.36%

Volatility

SPEM vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) has a higher volatility of 5.72% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) at 3.76%. This indicates that SPEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPEMSPYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.72%

3.76%

+1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.29%

10.18%

+5.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.72%

12.81%

+4.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.36%

16.94%

+0.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.80%

18.02%

+0.78%

SPEM vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPEM has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPEM vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison

SPEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, more than SPYM's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
2.54%2.77%2.78%2.80%3.38%3.14%1.92%2.94%2.34%1.12%1.51%2.40%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.79%2.23%1.75%1.97%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPEM and SPYM have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPEM has higher volatility (5.72%) compared to SPYM (3.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPEM dropped -64.41% vs SPYM's -54.46%.

On 10-year performance, SPYM leads with 15.21% vs 8.32% for SPEM. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 3.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 15.21% return vs 8.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for SPEM.

SPEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 1.02% for SPYM.

SPEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SPYM is S&P 500. SPEM tracks S&P Emerging BMI Index, while SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SPEM and 0.02% for SPYM.

SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPEM and SPYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer