SPEM vs. SCHF
SPEM (SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF) and SCHF (Schwab International Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the S&P Emerging Markets BMI, while SCHF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPEM returned 9.63%/yr vs 10.82%/yr for SCHF. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPEM charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHF.
Performance
SPEM vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPEM achieves a 11.32% return, which is significantly lower than SCHF's 15.39% return. Over the past 10 years, SPEM has underperformed SCHF with an annualized return of 9.63%, while SCHF has yielded a comparatively higher 10.82% annualized return.
SPEM
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- YTD
- 11.32%
- 6M
- 13.11%
- 1Y
- 25.79%
- 3Y*
- 17.37%
- 5Y*
- 5.60%
- 10Y*
- 9.63%
SCHF
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 1.57%
- YTD
- 15.39%
- 6M
- 17.24%
- 1Y
- 30.20%
- 3Y*
- 19.18%
- 5Y*
- 9.76%
- 10Y*
- 10.82%
SPEM vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPEM SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF | 11.32% | 25.63% | 11.40% | 10.51% | -17.90% | 1.51% | 14.55% | 19.69% | -13.26% | 34.82% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 15.39% | 34.55% | 3.28% | 18.35% | -14.80% | 11.40% | 9.48% | 22.26% | -14.29% | 26.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPEM and SCHF is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009 | 0.81 |
The correlation between SPEM and SCHF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPEM vs. SCHF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPEM
SCHF
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
SPEM
SCHF
Financial Services
SPEM
SCHF
Consumer Cyclical
SPEM
SCHF
Industrials
SPEM
SCHF
Basic Materials
SPEM
SCHF
Communication Services
SPEM
SCHF
Energy
SPEM
SCHF
Healthcare
SPEM
SCHF
Consumer Defensive
SPEM
SCHF
Utilities
SPEM
SCHF
Real Estate
SPEM
SCHF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPEM vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank
SPEM
SCHF
SPEM vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPEM | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.33 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 2.64 | -0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.16 | 10.14 | -1.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPEM vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPEM drawdown since its inception was -64.41%, which is greater than SCHF's maximum drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPEM and SCHF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPEM | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.41% | -34.87% | -29.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.36% | -11.48% | +0.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.62% | -13.41% | -4.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.75% | -29.14% | -2.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.06% | -34.87% | -1.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.40% | -1.00% | -1.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.73% | -7.37% | -7.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | 2.99% | +0.18% |
Volatility
SPEM vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) have volatilities of 6.87% and 6.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPEM | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.87% | 6.91% | -0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.21% | 14.42% | -0.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.67% | 16.67% | 0.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.26% | 16.56% | +0.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.83% | 17.24% | +1.59% |
SPEM vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPEM has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHF's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPEM vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison
SPEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, less than SCHF's 2.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 2.96% | 3.42% | 3.26% | 2.97% | 2.80% | 3.19% | 2.08% | 2.95% | 3.06% | 2.35% | 2.58% | 2.26% |
SPEM SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF | 2.49% | 2.77% | 2.78% | 2.80% | 3.38% | 3.14% | 1.92% | 2.94% | 2.34% | 1.12% | 1.51% | 2.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPEM and SCHF have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHF has higher volatility (6.91%) compared to SPEM (6.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPEM dropped -64.41% vs SCHF's -34.87%.
On 10-year performance, SCHF leads with 10.82% vs 9.63% for SPEM. On fees, SCHF is cheaper at 0.06% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHF has performed better with a 10.82% return vs 9.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHF is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.11% for SPEM.
SCHF has the higher dividend yield at 2.96%, compared with 2.49% for SPEM.
SPEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SCHF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. SPEM tracks S&P Emerging Markets BMI, while SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for SPEM and 0.06% for SCHF.
SCHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPEM and SCHF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer