SPEM vs. IFRA
SPEM (SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF) and IFRA (iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the S&P Emerging Markets BMI, while IFRA is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the NYSE FactSet U.S. Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPEM returned 5.60%/yr vs 13.16%/yr for IFRA. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPEM charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for IFRA.
Performance
SPEM vs. IFRA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPEM achieves a 11.32% return, which is significantly lower than IFRA's 18.48% return.
SPEM
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 2.50%
- YTD
- 11.32%
- 6M
- 13.11%
- 1Y
- 27.73%
- 3Y*
- 17.37%
- 5Y*
- 5.60%
- 10Y*
- 9.63%
IFRA
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- 2.41%
- YTD
- 18.48%
- 6M
- 17.32%
- 1Y
- 31.06%
- 3Y*
- 19.49%
- 5Y*
- 13.16%
- 10Y*
- —
SPEM vs. IFRA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPEM SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF | 11.32% | 25.63% | 11.40% | 10.51% | -17.90% | 1.51% | 14.55% | 19.69% | -15.34% |
IFRA iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF | 18.48% | 15.90% | 17.02% | 13.42% | -3.32% | 29.81% | 7.37% | 27.00% | -7.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPEM and IFRA is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2018 | 0.52 |
The correlation between SPEM and IFRA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPEM vs. IFRA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPEM
IFRA
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Energy
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
SPEM
IFRA
-
Financial Services
SPEM
IFRA
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPEM
IFRA
Industrials
SPEM
IFRA
Basic Materials
SPEM
IFRA
Communication Services
SPEM
IFRA
-
Energy
SPEM
IFRA
Healthcare
SPEM
IFRA
-
Consumer Defensive
SPEM
IFRA
Utilities
SPEM
IFRA
Real Estate
SPEM
IFRA
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPEM vs. IFRA — Risk / Return Rank
SPEM
IFRA
SPEM vs. IFRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) and iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPEM | IFRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.33 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 3.55 | -1.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.16 | 12.99 | -4.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPEM vs. IFRA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPEM drawdown since its inception was -64.41%, which is greater than IFRA's maximum drawdown of -41.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPEM and IFRA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPEM | IFRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.41% | -41.06% | -23.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.36% | -8.40% | -2.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.62% | -19.93% | +2.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.75% | -19.93% | -11.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.40% | -1.30% | -1.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.73% | -5.13% | -9.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | 2.30% | +0.87% |
Volatility
SPEM vs. IFRA - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) has a higher volatility of 6.87% compared to iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA) at 5.38%. This indicates that SPEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFRA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPEM | IFRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.87% | 5.38% | +1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.21% | 11.69% | +2.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.67% | 15.13% | +1.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.26% | 17.98% | -0.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.83% | 21.37% | -2.54% |
SPEM vs. IFRA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPEM has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than IFRA's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPEM vs. IFRA - Dividend Comparison
SPEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, more than IFRA's 1.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFRA iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF | 1.57% | 1.84% | 1.75% | 1.98% | 1.98% | 1.63% | 2.08% | 1.68% | 2.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPEM SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF | 2.49% | 2.77% | 2.78% | 2.80% | 3.38% | 3.14% | 1.92% | 2.94% | 2.34% | 1.12% | 1.51% | 2.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPEM and IFRA have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPEM has higher volatility (6.87%) compared to IFRA (5.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPEM dropped -64.41% vs IFRA's -41.06%.
On 5-year performance, IFRA leads with 13.16% vs 5.60% for SPEM. On fees, SPEM is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, IFRA has been the lower-risk option at 5.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IFRA has performed better with a 13.16% return vs 5.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPEM is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IFRA.
SPEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 1.57% for IFRA.
SPEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while IFRA is Industrials Equities. SPEM tracks S&P Emerging Markets BMI, while IFRA tracks NYSE FactSet U.S. Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for SPEM and 0.30% for IFRA.
IFRA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPEM and IFRA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer