PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPDW vs. HDEF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPDW vs. HDEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPDW achieves a 15.36% return, which is significantly higher than HDEF's 4.87% return. Over the past 10 years, SPDW has outperformed HDEF with an annualized return of 10.05%, while HDEF has yielded a comparatively lower 8.59% annualized return.


SPDW

1D
0.31%
1M
4.15%
YTD
15.36%
6M
18.10%
1Y
31.87%
3Y*
20.11%
5Y*
9.45%
10Y*
10.05%

HDEF

1D
0.84%
1M
-1.49%
YTD
4.87%
6M
7.11%
1Y
16.55%
3Y*
16.85%
5Y*
10.01%
10Y*
8.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPDW vs. HDEF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPDW
SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF
15.36%34.75%3.55%17.81%-15.98%11.45%9.90%22.41%-14.22%25.81%
HDEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF
4.87%33.01%2.85%18.53%-2.51%6.95%-1.90%25.02%-13.74%9.89%

Correlation

The correlation between SPDW and HDEF is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2015

0.77

The correlation between SPDW and HDEF shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPDW vs. HDEF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPDW
HDEF

Financial Services

22.9%
26.9%

Industrials

19.2%
8.8%

Technology

13.7%
0.6%

Healthcare

8.3%
14.0%

Consumer Cyclical

7.8%
3.9%

Basic Materials

7.3%
0.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
17.9%

Energy

5.5%
13.8%

Communication Services

3.8%
4.0%

Utilities

3.3%
8.4%

Real Estate

2.5%
0.9%

Financial Services

SPDW
22.9%
HDEF
26.9%

Industrials

SPDW
19.2%
HDEF
8.8%

Technology

SPDW
13.7%
HDEF
0.6%

Healthcare

SPDW
8.3%
HDEF
14.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SPDW
7.8%
HDEF
3.9%

Basic Materials

SPDW
7.3%
HDEF
0.7%

Consumer Defensive

SPDW
5.7%
HDEF
17.9%

Energy

SPDW
5.5%
HDEF
13.8%

Communication Services

SPDW
3.8%
HDEF
4.0%

Utilities

SPDW
3.3%
HDEF
8.4%

Real Estate

SPDW
2.5%
HDEF
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPDW vs. HDEF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPDW
SPDW Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SPDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPDW Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SPDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPDW Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

HDEF
HDEF Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
HDEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDEF Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
HDEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDEF Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPDW vs. HDEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPDWHDEFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.26

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

2.07

+0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.83

6.36

+4.47

SPDW vs. HDEF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPDW Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the HDEF Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPDW and HDEF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPDWHDEFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

1.42

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.71

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.53

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.45

-0.21

Drawdowns

SPDW vs. HDEF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPDW drawdown since its inception was -60.02%, which is greater than HDEF's maximum drawdown of -36.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPDW and HDEF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPDWHDEFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.02%

-36.43%

-23.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.55%

-8.03%

-3.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.53%

-11.15%

-2.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.21%

-23.63%

-6.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.98%

-36.43%

+1.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

-4.89%

+4.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.91%

-5.04%

-7.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

2.61%

+0.34%

Volatility

SPDW vs. HDEF - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) has a higher volatility of 5.44% compared to Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF) at 3.72%. This indicates that SPDW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPDWHDEFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.44%

3.72%

+1.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.17%

9.22%

+3.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.58%

11.68%

+3.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.49%

14.14%

+2.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.25%

16.24%

+1.01%

SPDW vs. HDEF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPDW has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than HDEF's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPDW vs. HDEF - Dividend Comparison

SPDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, less than HDEF's 3.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HDEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF
3.62%3.88%4.53%4.38%5.41%4.76%3.93%4.20%3.55%3.38%9.53%1.87%
SPDW
SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF
2.86%3.30%3.19%2.75%3.12%3.04%1.87%3.13%3.08%1.86%3.11%2.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPDW and HDEF have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPDW has higher volatility (5.44%) compared to HDEF (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPDW dropped -60.02% vs HDEF's -36.43%.

On 10-year performance, SPDW leads with 10.05% vs 8.59% for HDEF. On fees, SPDW is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, HDEF has been the lower-risk option at 3.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPDW has performed better with a 10.05% return vs 8.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPDW is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for HDEF.

HDEF has the higher dividend yield at 3.62%, compared with 2.86% for SPDW.

SPDW tracks S&P Developed Ex-U.S. BMI Index, while HDEF tracks MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield US Dollar Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SPDW and 0.20% for HDEF.

SPDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPDW and HDEF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer