PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPDV vs. VIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPDV vs. VIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPDV achieves a 14.19% return, which is significantly higher than VIG's 7.57% return.


SPDV

1D
-0.38%
1M
3.73%
YTD
14.19%
6M
14.91%
1Y
27.39%
3Y*
16.86%
5Y*
8.17%
10Y*

VIG

1D
-0.19%
1M
3.79%
YTD
7.57%
6M
6.99%
1Y
19.63%
3Y*
16.49%
5Y*
10.62%
10Y*
13.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPDV vs. VIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPDV
AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF
14.19%10.90%14.40%5.45%-2.27%29.54%-6.09%20.46%-6.59%3.65%
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
7.57%14.17%16.99%14.51%-9.80%23.76%15.43%29.62%-2.08%2.45%

Correlation

The correlation between SPDV and VIG is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2017

0.78

The correlation between SPDV and VIG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPDV vs. VIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPDV
VIG

Consumer Cyclical

13.5%
4.7%

Energy

12.3%
3.5%

Technology

11.1%
26.2%

Healthcare

9.7%
16.5%

Financial Services

9.2%
20.6%

Consumer Defensive

9.1%
10.1%

Real Estate

8.7%

-

Industrials

7.8%
11.8%

Communication Services

7.8%
0.5%

Utilities

5.8%
3.2%

Basic Materials

5.1%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SPDV
13.5%
VIG
4.7%

Energy

SPDV
12.3%
VIG
3.5%

Technology

SPDV
11.1%
VIG
26.2%

Healthcare

SPDV
9.7%
VIG
16.5%

Financial Services

SPDV
9.2%
VIG
20.6%

Consumer Defensive

SPDV
9.1%
VIG
10.1%

Real Estate

SPDV
8.7%
VIG

-

Industrials

SPDV
7.8%
VIG
11.8%

Communication Services

SPDV
7.8%
VIG
0.5%

Utilities

SPDV
5.8%
VIG
3.2%

Basic Materials

SPDV
5.1%
VIG
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPDV vs. VIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPDV
SPDV Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SPDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPDV Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SPDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

VIG
VIG Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIG Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
VIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIG Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPDV vs. VIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPDVVIGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.35

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.74

2.49

+2.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.66

10.06

+3.60

SPDV vs. VIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the VIG Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPDV and VIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPDVVIGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

1.97

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.75

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.60

-0.14

Drawdowns

SPDV vs. VIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPDV drawdown since its inception was -43.81%, smaller than the maximum VIG drawdown of -46.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPDV and VIG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPDVVIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.81%

-46.81%

+3.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.80%

-7.91%

+2.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.62%

-14.95%

-3.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.31%

-20.39%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

-0.19%

-0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.57%

-5.51%

-1.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

1.96%

+0.05%

Volatility

SPDV vs. VIG - Volatility Comparison

AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) has a higher volatility of 2.76% compared to Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) at 2.19%. This indicates that SPDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPDVVIGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.76%

2.19%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.16%

7.57%

+0.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.18%

10.01%

+2.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.30%

14.23%

+2.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.31%

16.05%

+4.26%

SPDV vs. VIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPDV has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VIG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPDV vs. VIG - Dividend Comparison

SPDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, more than VIG's 1.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPDV
AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF
3.31%3.85%3.54%3.95%3.73%3.08%3.90%3.54%3.63%0.28%0.00%0.00%
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
1.47%1.62%1.73%1.88%1.96%1.55%1.63%1.71%2.08%1.88%2.14%2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPDV and VIG have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPDV has higher volatility (2.76%) compared to VIG (2.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPDV dropped -43.81% vs VIG's -46.81%.

On 5-year performance, VIG leads with 10.62% vs 8.17% for SPDV. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VIG has performed better with a 10.62% return vs 8.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for SPDV.

SPDV has the higher dividend yield at 3.31%, compared with 1.47% for VIG.

SPDV tracks S&P 500 Dividend and Free Cash Flow Yield Index, while VIG tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. They also come from different issuers: Advisors Asset Management and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for SPDV and 0.04% for VIG.

SPDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPDV and VIG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer