PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPDV vs. DVYA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPDV vs. DVYA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) and iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPDV achieves a 14.19% return, which is significantly higher than DVYA's 13.35% return.


SPDV

1D
-0.38%
1M
3.73%
YTD
14.19%
6M
14.91%
1Y
27.39%
3Y*
16.86%
5Y*
8.17%
10Y*

DVYA

1D
-0.86%
1M
0.51%
YTD
13.35%
6M
13.63%
1Y
39.49%
3Y*
21.73%
5Y*
9.88%
10Y*
7.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPDV vs. DVYA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPDV
AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF
14.19%10.90%14.40%5.45%-2.27%29.54%-6.09%20.46%-6.59%3.65%
DVYA
iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF
13.35%30.22%6.05%13.75%-2.17%3.41%-9.61%14.70%-14.87%3.00%

Correlation

The correlation between SPDV and DVYA is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2017

0.60

The correlation between SPDV and DVYA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPDV vs. DVYA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPDV
DVYA

Consumer Cyclical

13.5%
10.9%

Energy

12.3%
5.0%

Technology

11.1%
1.6%

Healthcare

9.7%
3.5%

Financial Services

9.2%
30.9%

Consumer Defensive

9.1%
5.2%

Real Estate

8.7%
10.6%

Industrials

7.8%
7.1%

Communication Services

7.8%
4.7%

Utilities

5.8%
4.5%

Basic Materials

5.1%
16.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SPDV
13.5%
DVYA
10.9%

Energy

SPDV
12.3%
DVYA
5.0%

Technology

SPDV
11.1%
DVYA
1.6%

Healthcare

SPDV
9.7%
DVYA
3.5%

Financial Services

SPDV
9.2%
DVYA
30.9%

Consumer Defensive

SPDV
9.1%
DVYA
5.2%

Real Estate

SPDV
8.7%
DVYA
10.6%

Industrials

SPDV
7.8%
DVYA
7.1%

Communication Services

SPDV
7.8%
DVYA
4.7%

Utilities

SPDV
5.8%
DVYA
4.5%

Basic Materials

SPDV
5.1%
DVYA
16.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPDV vs. DVYA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPDV
SPDV Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SPDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPDV Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SPDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

DVYA
DVYA Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
DVYA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DVYA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
DVYA Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
DVYA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
DVYA Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPDV vs. DVYA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) and iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPDVDVYADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.26

3.05

-0.79

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.35

4.06

-0.71

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.53

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.74

4.59

+0.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.66

16.66

-3.00

SPDV vs. DVYA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the DVYA Sharpe Ratio of 3.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPDV and DVYA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPDVDVYADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

3.05

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.66

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.30

+0.15

Drawdowns

SPDV vs. DVYA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPDV drawdown since its inception was -43.81%, roughly equal to the maximum DVYA drawdown of -45.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPDV and DVYA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPDVDVYADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.81%

-45.61%

+1.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.80%

-8.64%

+2.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.62%

-19.15%

+0.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.31%

-25.37%

+4.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

-3.11%

+2.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.57%

-10.06%

+3.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

2.38%

-0.37%

Volatility

SPDV vs. DVYA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) is 2.76%, while iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA) has a volatility of 3.94%. This indicates that SPDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DVYA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPDVDVYADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.76%

3.94%

-1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.16%

10.44%

-2.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.18%

13.00%

-0.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.30%

15.08%

+1.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.31%

17.55%

+2.76%

SPDV vs. DVYA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPDV has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than DVYA's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPDV vs. DVYA - Dividend Comparison

SPDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, less than DVYA's 4.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DVYA
iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF
4.33%4.71%5.97%6.48%7.29%5.81%3.66%5.52%6.24%4.74%4.79%5.33%
SPDV
AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF
3.31%3.85%3.54%3.95%3.73%3.08%3.90%3.54%3.63%0.28%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPDV and DVYA have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DVYA has higher volatility (3.94%) compared to SPDV (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPDV dropped -43.81% vs DVYA's -45.61%.

On 5-year performance, DVYA leads with 9.88% vs 8.17% for SPDV. On fees, SPDV is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, SPDV has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DVYA has performed better with a 9.88% return vs 8.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPDV is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for DVYA.

DVYA has the higher dividend yield at 4.33%, compared with 3.31% for SPDV.

SPDV is categorized as Dividend, while DVYA is Asia Pacific Equities. SPDV tracks S&P 500 Dividend and Free Cash Flow Yield Index, while DVYA tracks Dow Jones Asia/Pacific Select Dividend 30 Index. They also come from different issuers: Advisors Asset Management and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for SPDV and 0.49% for DVYA.

DVYA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPDV and DVYA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer