PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPDG vs. SPYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPDG vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF (SPDG) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPDG achieves a 16.69% return, which is significantly higher than SPYM's 10.98% return.


SPDG

1D
-0.67%
1M
7.25%
YTD
16.69%
6M
16.41%
1Y
28.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPYM

1D
-0.66%
1M
5.06%
YTD
10.98%
6M
10.98%
1Y
28.09%
3Y*
22.46%
5Y*
13.91%
10Y*
15.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPDG vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SPDG
SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF
16.69%11.66%20.22%8.14%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
10.98%17.79%25.00%7.43%

Correlation

The correlation between SPDG and SPYM is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2023

0.76

The correlation between SPDG and SPYM shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPDG vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPDG
SPYM

Technology

35.5%
38.5%

Financial Services

12.9%
11.1%

Communication Services

10.5%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
9.9%

Healthcare

9.1%
8.4%

Industrials

8.5%
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
4.6%

Energy

3.3%
3.2%

Utilities

2.4%
2.5%

Real Estate

2.2%
1.8%

Basic Materials

1.4%
1.7%

Technology

SPDG
35.5%
SPYM
38.5%

Financial Services

SPDG
12.9%
SPYM
11.1%

Communication Services

SPDG
10.5%
SPYM
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

SPDG
9.5%
SPYM
9.9%

Healthcare

SPDG
9.1%
SPYM
8.4%

Industrials

SPDG
8.5%
SPYM
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

SPDG
4.7%
SPYM
4.6%

Energy

SPDG
3.3%
SPYM
3.2%

Utilities

SPDG
2.4%
SPYM
2.5%

Real Estate

SPDG
2.2%
SPYM
1.8%

Basic Materials

SPDG
1.4%
SPYM
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPDG vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPDG
SPDG Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SPDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPDG Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
SPDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPDG Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYM
SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPDG vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF (SPDG) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPDGSPYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.44

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.45

3.17

+0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.57

14.76

-3.19

SPDG vs. SPYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPDG Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the SPYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPDG and SPYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPDGSPYMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

2.39

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.52

0.62

+0.90

Drawdowns

SPDG vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPDG drawdown since its inception was -15.67%, smaller than the maximum SPYM drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPDG and SPYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPDGSPYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.67%

-54.46%

+38.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.34%

-8.90%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.67%

-0.66%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.19%

-7.15%

+4.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

1.91%

+0.57%

Volatility

SPDG vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF (SPDG) has a higher volatility of 3.54% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) at 2.83%. This indicates that SPDG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPDGSPYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

2.83%

+0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.23%

8.90%

+0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.14%

11.80%

+0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.18%

16.80%

-2.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.18%

18.00%

-3.82%

SPDG vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPDG has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPDG vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison

SPDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, more than SPYM's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPDG
SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF
2.59%2.87%2.61%0.90%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
1.00%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.79%2.23%1.75%1.97%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPDG and SPYM have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPDG has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to SPYM (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPDG dropped -15.67% vs SPYM's -54.46%.

On 1-year performance, SPDG leads with 28.62% vs 28.09% for SPYM. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPDG has performed better with a 28.62% return vs 28.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for SPDG.

SPDG has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 1.00% for SPYM.

SPDG is categorized as Dividend, while SPYM is S&P 500. SPDG tracks S&P Sector-Neutral High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index, while SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPDG and 0.02% for SPYM.

SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPDG and SPYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer