PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPDG vs. SCDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SPDG vs. SCDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF (SPDG) and ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN (SCDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SPDG vs. SCDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SPDG
SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF
2.97%11.66%20.22%8.14%
SCDL
ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN
24.46%2.05%14.99%7.57%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPDG achieves a 2.97% return, which is significantly lower than SCDL's 24.46% return.


SPDG

1D
1.61%
1M
-5.04%
YTD
2.97%
6M
5.24%
1Y
13.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SCDL

1D
0.85%
1M
-5.08%
YTD
24.46%
6M
26.60%
1Y
20.68%
3Y*
16.30%
5Y*
9.62%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SPDG vs. SCDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPDG has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than SCDL's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SPDG vs. SCDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPDG
SPDG Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
SPDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPDG Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SPDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPDG Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

SCDL
SCDL Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
SCDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCDL Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
SCDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCDL Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPDG vs. SCDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF (SPDG) and ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN (SCDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPDGSCDLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.85

0.64

+0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.26

1.09

+0.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.16

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.27

0.92

+0.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.92

2.80

+2.12

SPDG vs. SCDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPDG Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is higher than the SCDL Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPDG and SCDL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPDGSCDLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

0.64

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.21

0.47

+0.74

Correlation

The correlation between SPDG and SCDL is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SPDG vs. SCDL - Dividend Comparison

SPDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, while SCDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023
SPDG
SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF
2.94%2.87%2.61%0.90%
SCDL
ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

SPDG vs. SCDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPDG drawdown since its inception was -15.67%, smaller than the maximum SCDL drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPDG and SCDL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SPDGSCDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.67%

-34.87%

+19.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.84%

-25.74%

+13.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.79%

-5.81%

-0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.21%

-12.26%

+10.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

8.61%

-5.56%

Volatility

SPDG vs. SCDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF (SPDG) is 3.98%, while ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN (SCDL) has a volatility of 4.69%. This indicates that SPDG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SPDGSCDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.98%

4.69%

-0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.07%

15.48%

-6.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.15%

32.67%

-16.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.21%

29.06%

-14.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.21%

29.12%

-14.91%