SPDG vs. BIL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SPDG (SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF) and BIL (SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPDG is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P Sector-Neutral High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index, while BIL is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SPDG returned 28.62% vs 3.87% for BIL. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. SPDG charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for BIL.

Performance

SPDG vs. BIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF (SPDG) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPDG achieves a 16.69% return, which is significantly higher than BIL's 1.49% return.

SPDG

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 7.25%
• YTD: 16.69%
• 6M: 16.41%
• 1Y: 28.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BIL

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 1.49%
• 6M: 1.77%
• 1Y: 3.87%
• 3Y*: 4.64%
• 5Y*: 3.41%
• 10Y*: 2.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPDG vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SPDG SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF	16.69%	11.66%	20.22%	8.14%
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF	1.49%	4.15%	5.19%	1.60%

Correlation

The correlation between SPDG and BIL is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2023	-0.06

Return for Risk

SPDG vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPDG

SPDG Risk / Return Rank: 69
SPDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
SPDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
SPDG Omega Ratio Rank: 69
SPDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
SPDG Martin Ratio Rank: 63

BIL

BIL Risk / Return Rank: 100
BIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
BIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100
BIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
BIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPDG vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF (SPDG) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPDG	BIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.37	19.71	-17.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.41	174.16	-170.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	87.91	-86.49
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.45	355.35	-351.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.57	2,817.77	-2,806.21
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPDG vs. BIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPDG Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is lower than the BIL Sharpe Ratio of 19.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPDG and BIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPDG	BIL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.37	19.71	-17.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	13.16	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	8.52	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.52	2.78	-1.26

Drawdowns

SPDG vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPDG drawdown since its inception was -15.67%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPDG and BIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPDG	BIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.67%	-0.78%	-14.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.34%	-0.01%	-8.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.01%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-0.10%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-0.21%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.67%	0.00%	-0.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.19%	-0.26%	-1.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.48%	0.00%	+2.48%

Volatility

SPDG vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF (SPDG) has a higher volatility of 3.54% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.05%. This indicates that SPDG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPDG	BIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.54%	0.05%	+3.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.23%	0.13%	+9.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.14%	0.20%	+11.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.18%	0.26%	+13.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.18%	0.26%	+13.92%

SPDG vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPDG has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SPDG vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison

SPDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, less than BIL's 3.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF	3.86%	4.13%	5.03%	4.92%	1.35%	0.00%	0.30%	2.05%	1.66%	0.68%	0.07%
SPDG SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF	2.59%	2.87%	2.61%	0.90%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPDG and BIL in my portfolio?

SPDG and BIL have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPDG or BIL?

SPDG has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to BIL (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPDG dropped -15.67% vs BIL's -0.78%.

Which ETF is better, SPDG or BIL?

On 1-year performance, SPDG leads with 28.62% vs 3.87% for BIL. On fees, SPDG is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, BIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPDG or BIL?

Over the 1-year period, SPDG has performed better with a 28.62% return vs 3.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPDG or BIL?

SPDG is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for BIL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPDG or BIL?

BIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.86%, compared with 2.59% for SPDG.

What is the main difference between SPDG and BIL?

SPDG is categorized as Dividend, while BIL is Government Bonds. SPDG tracks S&P Sector-Neutral High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index, while BIL tracks Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPDG and 0.14% for BIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.71 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.