SPBX vs. QB

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

SPBX (AllianzIM 6 Month Buffer10 Allocation ETF) and QB (ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. SPBX is actively managed, while QB is passively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPBX charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for QB.

Performance

SPBX vs. QB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM 6 Month Buffer10 Allocation ETF (SPBX) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPBX achieves a 5.05% return, which is significantly lower than QB's 6.95% return.

SPBX

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: 0.55%
• YTD: 5.05%
• 6M: 5.64%
• 1Y: 14.18%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QB

• 1D: -3.00%
• 1M: -1.90%
• YTD: 6.95%
• 6M: 6.54%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPBX vs. QB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SPBX AllianzIM 6 Month Buffer10 Allocation ETF	5.05%	6.78%
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	6.95%	5.77%

Correlation

The correlation between SPBX and QB is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025	0.75

Return for Risk

SPBX vs. QB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPBX

SPBX Risk / Return Rank: 82
SPBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
SPBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
SPBX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
SPBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
SPBX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPBX vs. QB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM 6 Month Buffer10 Allocation ETF (SPBX) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPBX	QB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.54	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.72	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.17	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.47	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPBX	QB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.54	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.15	2.15	-1.00

Drawdowns

SPBX vs. QB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPBX drawdown since its inception was -11.11%, which is greater than QB's maximum drawdown of -3.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPBX and QB.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPBX	QB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.11%	-3.47%	-7.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.49%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.80%	-3.47%	+2.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.15%	-0.36%	-0.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.92%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SPBX	QB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.13%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.60%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.62%	6.54%	-0.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.41%	6.54%	+2.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.41%	6.54%	+2.87%

SPBX vs. QB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPBX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than QB's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPBX vs. QB - Dividend Comparison

SPBX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%.

Position	TTM	2025
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	0.64%	0.48%
SPBX AllianzIM 6 Month Buffer10 Allocation ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPBX and QB in my portfolio?

SPBX and QB have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SPBX or QB?

On fees, QB is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPBX or QB?

QB is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for SPBX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPBX or QB?

QB has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.00% for SPBX.

What is the main difference between SPBX and QB?

They also come from different issuers: Allianz and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for SPBX and 0.58% for QB.