SPBX vs. FEBT

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

SPBX (AllianzIM 6 Month Buffer10 Allocation ETF) and FEBT (Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPBX is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Allianz, while FEBT is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Allianz. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SPBX returned 12.87% vs 17.21% for FEBT. Their correlation of 0.94 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SPBX charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for FEBT.

Performance

SPBX vs. FEBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM 6 Month Buffer10 Allocation ETF (SPBX) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF (FEBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPBX achieves a 6.99% return, which is significantly lower than FEBT's 8.57% return.

SPBX

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: 0.81%
• 6M: 5.96%
• YTD: 6.99%
• 1Y: 12.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.89%

FEBT

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 0.73%
• 6M: 6.29%
• YTD: 8.57%
• 1Y: 17.21%
• 3Y*: 14.72%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FEBT Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF	$342.73K	$323.88K	$521.88K
SPBX AllianzIM 6 Month Buffer10 Allocation ETF	$439.67K	$807.70K	$429.46K

SPBX vs. FEBT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SPBX AllianzIM 6 Month Buffer10 Allocation ETF	6.99%	9.79%
FEBT Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF	8.57%	12.39%

Correlation

The correlation between SPBX and FEBT is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2025	0.94

The correlation between SPBX and FEBT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SPBX vs. FEBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPBX

SPBX Risk / Return Rank: 86
SPBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
SPBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
SPBX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
SPBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
SPBX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

FEBT

FEBT Risk / Return Rank: 84
FEBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
FEBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
FEBT Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FEBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
FEBT Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPBX vs. FEBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM 6 Month Buffer10 Allocation ETF (SPBX) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF (FEBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SPBX	FEBT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.16	2.00	+0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.17	2.88	+0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.37	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.74	2.66	+0.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.19	13.05	+0.13

SPBX vs. FEBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the FEBT Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPBX and FEBT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SPBX vs. FEBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPBX drawdown since its inception was -11.11%, smaller than the maximum FEBT drawdown of -13.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPBX and FEBT.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPBX	FEBT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.11%	-13.19%	+2.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.49%	-6.04%	+1.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.19%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.14%	+0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.08%	-1.16%	+0.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.93%	1.23%	-0.30%

Volatility

SPBX vs. FEBT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM 6 Month Buffer10 Allocation ETF (SPBX) is 1.57%, while Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF (FEBT) has a volatility of 2.22%. This indicates that SPBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPBX	FEBT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.57%	2.22%	-0.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.73%	6.46%	-1.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.69%	8.04%	-2.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.10%	9.70%	-0.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.10%	9.70%	-0.60%

SPBX vs. FEBT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPBX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FEBT's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPBX vs. FEBT - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPBX nor FEBT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FEBT Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.28%
SPBX AllianzIM 6 Month Buffer10 Allocation ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPBX and FEBT in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, SPBX and FEBT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SPBX or FEBT?

FEBT has higher volatility (2.22%) compared to SPBX (1.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPBX dropped -11.11% vs FEBT's -13.19%.

Which ETF is better, SPBX or FEBT?

On 1-year performance, FEBT leads with 17.21% vs 12.87% for SPBX. On fees, FEBT is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, SPBX has been the lower-risk option at 1.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPBX or FEBT?

Over the 1-year period, FEBT has performed better with a 17.21% return vs 12.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPBX or FEBT?

FEBT is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for SPBX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPBX or FEBT?

SPBX and FEBT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between SPBX and FEBT?

SPBX is categorized as Defined Outcome, while FEBT is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for SPBX and 0.74% for FEBT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.