SPBU vs. QB

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

SPBU (AllianzIM Buffer15 Uncapped Allocation ETF) and QB (ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. SPBU is actively managed, while QB is passively managed. Over the past year, SPBU returned 15.51% vs 18.28% for QB. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPBU charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for QB.

Performance

SPBU vs. QB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM Buffer15 Uncapped Allocation ETF (SPBU) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPBU achieves a 7.37% return, which is significantly lower than QB's 12.15% return.

SPBU

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: 0.61%
• 6M: 5.64%
• YTD: 7.37%
• 1Y: 15.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QB

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 3.02%
• 6M: 10.85%
• YTD: 12.15%
• 1Y: 18.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPBU vs. QB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SPBU AllianzIM Buffer15 Uncapped Allocation ETF	7.37%	9.92%
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	12.15%	6.10%

Correlation

The correlation between SPBU and QB is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.76

The correlation between SPBU and QB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPBU vs. QB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPBU	QB
Technology	38.4%	49.9%
Financial Services	11.0%	0.2%
Communication Services	10.8%	16.4%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	12.5%
Healthcare	8.4%	5.3%
Industrials	7.9%	3.7%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	8.6%
Energy	3.2%	0.6%
Utilities	2.1%	1.6%
Real Estate	1.8%	0.1%
Basic Materials	1.7%	1.3%

Return for Risk

SPBU vs. QB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPBU

SPBU Risk / Return Rank: 58
SPBU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
SPBU Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
SPBU Omega Ratio Rank: 55
SPBU Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
SPBU Martin Ratio Rank: 63

QB

QB Risk / Return Rank: 94
QB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
QB Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
QB Omega Ratio Rank: 95
QB Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
QB Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPBU vs. QB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM Buffer15 Uncapped Allocation ETF (SPBU) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SPBU	QB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	2.62	-1.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.22	3.81	-1.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.62	-0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.20	5.28	-3.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.89	25.48	-16.59

SPBU vs. QB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPBU Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is lower than the QB Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPBU and QB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SPBU vs. QB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPBU drawdown since its inception was -8.61%, which is greater than QB's maximum drawdown of -3.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPBU and QB.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPBU	QB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.61%	-3.47%	-5.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.10%	-3.47%	-3.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.45%	-0.31%	-1.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.34%	-0.42%	-0.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.75%	0.72%	+1.03%

Volatility

SPBU vs. QB - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM Buffer15 Uncapped Allocation ETF (SPBU) has a higher volatility of 3.44% compared to ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB) at 3.05%. This indicates that SPBU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPBU	QB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.44%	3.05%	+0.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.78%	5.83%	+1.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.09%	7.03%	+3.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.76%	6.93%	+4.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.76%	6.93%	+4.83%

SPBU vs. QB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPBU has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than QB's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPBU vs. QB - Dividend Comparison

SPBU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%.

Position	TTM	2025
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	0.78%	0.48%
SPBU AllianzIM Buffer15 Uncapped Allocation ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPBU and QB in my portfolio?

SPBU and QB have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPBU or QB?

SPBU has higher volatility (3.44%) compared to QB (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPBU dropped -8.61% vs QB's -3.47%.

Which ETF is better, SPBU or QB?

On 1-year performance, QB leads with 18.28% vs 15.51% for SPBU. On fees, QB is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, QB has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPBU or QB?

Over the 1-year period, QB has performed better with a 18.28% return vs 15.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPBU or QB?

QB is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for SPBU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPBU or QB?

QB has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.00% for SPBU.

What is the main difference between SPBU and QB?

They also come from different issuers: Allianz and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for SPBU and 0.58% for QB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.