PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPBU vs. ARLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPBU vs. ARLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM Buffer15 Uncapped Allocation ETF (SPBU) and Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF (ARLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPBU achieves a 8.95% return, which is significantly higher than ARLU's 6.41% return.


SPBU

1D
0.10%
1M
4.89%
YTD
8.95%
6M
8.80%
1Y
21.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ARLU

1D
-0.53%
1M
4.52%
YTD
6.41%
6M
6.03%
1Y
19.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPBU vs. ARLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SPBU and ARLU is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2025

0.97

The correlation between SPBU and ARLU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPBU vs. ARLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPBU
SPBU Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SPBU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPBU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPBU Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SPBU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPBU Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

ARLU
ARLU Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
ARLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARLU Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
ARLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARLU Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPBU vs. ARLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM Buffer15 Uncapped Allocation ETF (SPBU) and Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF (ARLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPBUARLUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.32

1.75

+0.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.32

2.40

+0.92

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.32

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

2.01

+1.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.63

9.00

+4.63

SPBU vs. ARLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPBU Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is higher than the ARLU Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPBU and ARLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPBUARLUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

1.75

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.64

1.00

+0.64

Drawdowns

SPBU vs. ARLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPBU drawdown since its inception was -8.30%, smaller than the maximum ARLU drawdown of -15.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPBU and ARLU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPBUARLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.30%

-15.38%

+7.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.10%

-9.66%

+2.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.53%

+0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.25%

-2.23%

+0.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

2.15%

-0.53%

Volatility

SPBU vs. ARLU - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM Buffer15 Uncapped Allocation ETF (SPBU) and Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF (ARLU) have volatilities of 2.55% and 2.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPBUARLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.55%

2.63%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.94%

8.73%

-1.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.44%

11.13%

-1.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.65%

12.56%

-0.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.65%

12.56%

-0.91%

SPBU vs. ARLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPBU has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than ARLU's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPBU vs. ARLU - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPBU nor ARLU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, SPBU and ARLU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ARLU has higher volatility (2.63%) compared to SPBU (2.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPBU dropped -8.30% vs ARLU's -15.38%.

On 1-year performance, SPBU leads with 21.80% vs 19.35% for ARLU. On fees, ARLU is cheaper at 0.74% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPBU has performed better with a 21.80% return vs 19.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ARLU is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for SPBU.

SPBU and ARLU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

SPBU is categorized as Defined Outcome, while ARLU is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for SPBU and 0.74% for ARLU.

SPBU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPBU and ARLU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer