SPBU vs. ARLU
SPBU (AllianzIM Buffer15 Uncapped Allocation ETF) and ARLU (Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPBU is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Allianz, while ARLU is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Allianz. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SPBU returned 21.80% vs 19.35% for ARLU. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SPBU charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for ARLU.
Performance
SPBU vs. ARLU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPBU achieves a 8.95% return, which is significantly higher than ARLU's 6.41% return.
SPBU
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 4.89%
- YTD
- 8.95%
- 6M
- 8.80%
- 1Y
- 21.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARLU
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 4.52%
- YTD
- 6.41%
- 6M
- 6.03%
- 1Y
- 19.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPBU vs. ARLU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPBU AllianzIM Buffer15 Uncapped Allocation ETF | 8.95% | 13.85% |
ARLU Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF | 6.41% | 14.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPBU and ARLU is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2025 | 0.97 |
The correlation between SPBU and ARLU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPBU vs. ARLU — Risk / Return Rank
SPBU
ARLU
SPBU vs. ARLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM Buffer15 Uncapped Allocation ETF (SPBU) and Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF (ARLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPBU | ARLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.32 | 1.75 | +0.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.32 | 2.40 | +0.92 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.32 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.12 | 2.01 | +1.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.63 | 9.00 | +4.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPBU | ARLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32 | 1.75 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.64 | 1.00 | +0.64 |
Drawdowns
SPBU vs. ARLU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPBU drawdown since its inception was -8.30%, smaller than the maximum ARLU drawdown of -15.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPBU and ARLU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPBU | ARLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.30% | -15.38% | +7.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.10% | -9.66% | +2.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.53% | +0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.25% | -2.23% | +0.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.62% | 2.15% | -0.53% |
Volatility
SPBU vs. ARLU - Volatility Comparison
AllianzIM Buffer15 Uncapped Allocation ETF (SPBU) and Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF (ARLU) have volatilities of 2.55% and 2.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPBU | ARLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.55% | 2.63% | -0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.94% | 8.73% | -1.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.44% | 11.13% | -1.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.65% | 12.56% | -0.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.65% | 12.56% | -0.91% |
SPBU vs. ARLU - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPBU has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than ARLU's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPBU vs. ARLU - Dividend Comparison
Neither SPBU nor ARLU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, SPBU and ARLU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ARLU has higher volatility (2.63%) compared to SPBU (2.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPBU dropped -8.30% vs ARLU's -15.38%.
On 1-year performance, SPBU leads with 21.80% vs 19.35% for ARLU. On fees, ARLU is cheaper at 0.74% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SPBU has performed better with a 21.80% return vs 19.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ARLU is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for SPBU.
SPBU and ARLU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
SPBU is categorized as Defined Outcome, while ARLU is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for SPBU and 0.74% for ARLU.
SPBU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPBU and ARLU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer