SPAM vs. FTEC

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

SPAM (Themes Cybersecurity ETF) and FTEC (Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - SPAM tracks the Solactive Cyber Security Index - Benchmark TR Net while FTEC tracks the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SPAM returned 35.08% vs 39.05% for FTEC. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPAM charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FTEC.

Performance

SPAM vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPAM achieves a 37.89% return, which is significantly higher than FTEC's 23.14% return.

SPAM

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 10.38%
• 6M: 31.89%
• YTD: 37.89%
• 1Y: 35.08%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FTEC

• 1D: -2.12%
• 1M: -0.92%
• 6M: 21.21%
• YTD: 23.14%
• 1Y: 39.05%
• 3Y*: 28.44%
• 5Y*: 18.71%
• 10Y*: 24.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPAM vs. FTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SPAM Themes Cybersecurity ETF	37.89%	4.86%	10.58%	6.74%
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF	23.14%	22.11%	29.40%	4.59%

Correlation

The correlation between SPAM and FTEC is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2023	0.66

The correlation between SPAM and FTEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPAM vs. FTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPAM	FTEC
Technology	89.6%	98.6%
Communication Services	5.7%	0.0%
Industrials	4.4%	0.5%
Real Estate	0.4%	-
Financial Services	0.1%	0.4%
Basic Materials	-	0.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	0.3%
Healthcare	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

SPAM vs. FTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPAM

SPAM Risk / Return Rank: 39
SPAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
SPAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
SPAM Omega Ratio Rank: 42
SPAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
SPAM Martin Ratio Rank: 29

FTEC

FTEC Risk / Return Rank: 58
FTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
FTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
FTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 58
FTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
FTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPAM vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SPAM	FTEC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.27	1.68	-0.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.79	2.19	-0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.28	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.47	2.41	-0.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.23	7.04	-3.80

SPAM vs. FTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPAM Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the FTEC Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPAM and FTEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SPAM vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPAM drawdown since its inception was -24.02%, smaller than the maximum FTEC drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPAM and FTEC.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPAM	FTEC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.02%	-34.95%	+10.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.02%	-16.26%	-7.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-27.30%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.95%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.95%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.88%	-8.03%	+5.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.52%	-5.57%	-0.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.89%	5.56%	+5.33%

Volatility

SPAM vs. FTEC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM) is 7.88%, while Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) has a volatility of 9.63%. This indicates that SPAM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPAM	FTEC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.88%	9.63%	-1.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.74%	19.41%	+4.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.91%	23.43%	+4.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.94%	25.73%	-0.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.94%	24.90%	+0.04%

SPAM vs. FTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPAM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FTEC's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPAM vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison

SPAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, which matches FTEC's 0.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF	0.36%	0.43%	0.49%	0.77%	0.93%	0.63%	0.83%	1.03%	1.20%	0.96%	1.25%	1.27%
SPAM Themes Cybersecurity ETF	0.36%	0.49%	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPAM and FTEC in my portfolio?

SPAM and FTEC have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPAM or FTEC?

FTEC has higher volatility (9.63%) compared to SPAM (7.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPAM dropped -24.02% vs FTEC's -34.95%.

Which ETF is better, SPAM or FTEC?

On 1-year performance, FTEC leads with 39.05% vs 35.08% for SPAM. On fees, FTEC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, SPAM has been the lower-risk option at 7.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPAM or FTEC?

Over the 1-year period, FTEC has performed better with a 39.05% return vs 35.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPAM or FTEC?

FTEC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SPAM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPAM or FTEC?

SPAM and FTEC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.36%.

What is the main difference between SPAM and FTEC?

SPAM tracks Solactive Cyber Security Index - Benchmark TR Net, while FTEC tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Themes and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SPAM and 0.08% for FTEC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.