SOXS vs. ZSL
SOXS (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares) and ZSL (ProShares UltraShort Silver) are both exchange-traded funds - SOXS is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Index (-300%), while ZSL is a Silver fund tracking the Bloomberg Silver Subindex (-2x). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SOXS returned -78.81%/yr vs -44.03%/yr for ZSL. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SOXS charges 1.08%/yr vs 1.32%/yr for ZSL.
Performance
SOXS vs. ZSL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOXS achieves a -91.68% return, which is significantly lower than ZSL's -61.84% return. Over the past 10 years, SOXS has underperformed ZSL with an annualized return of -78.81%, while ZSL has yielded a comparatively higher -44.03% annualized return.
SOXS
- 1D
- -17.41%
- 1M
- -60.17%
- YTD
- -91.68%
- 6M
- -91.80%
- 1Y
- -97.83%
- 3Y*
- -86.41%
- 5Y*
- -79.75%
- 10Y*
- -78.81%
ZSL
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -5.32%
- YTD
- -61.84%
- 6M
- -76.77%
- 1Y
- -92.65%
- 3Y*
- -70.19%
- 5Y*
- -52.70%
- 10Y*
- -44.03%
SOXS vs. ZSL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOXS Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares | -91.68% | -85.53% | -59.55% | -84.56% | 15.76% | -80.94% | -92.90% | -83.81% | -19.39% | -69.39% |
ZSL ProShares UltraShort Silver | -61.84% | -87.29% | -42.43% | -5.49% | -28.09% | -2.04% | -74.44% | -27.76% | 18.15% | -18.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOXS and ZSL is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2010 | 0.16 |
The correlation between SOXS and ZSL shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOXS vs. ZSL — Risk / Return Rank
SOXS
ZSL
SOXS vs. ZSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS) and ProShares UltraShort Silver (ZSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SOXS | ZSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.96 | -0.78 | -0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.97 | -2.44 | -1.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.58 | 0.74 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.00 | -0.99 | -0.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.39 | -1.37 | -0.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SOXS | ZSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.96 | -0.78 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.74 | -0.71 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.79 | -0.68 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.79 | -0.67 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
SOXS vs. ZSL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOXS drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum ZSL drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOXS and ZSL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOXS | ZSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -100.00% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -97.64% | -94.55% | -3.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -99.79% | -98.40% | -1.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.97% | -99.06% | -0.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -100.00% | -99.82% | -0.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -100.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -92.60% | -96.39% | +3.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 70.48% | 67.99% | +2.49% |
Volatility
SOXS vs. ZSL - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS) has a higher volatility of 44.74% compared to ProShares UltraShort Silver (ZSL) at 32.64%. This indicates that SOXS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOXS | ZSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 44.74% | 32.64% | +12.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 83.91% | 105.75% | -21.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 102.16% | 119.75% | -17.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 108.22% | 74.08% | +34.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 100.49% | 65.19% | +35.30% |
SOXS vs. ZSL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOXS has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is lower than ZSL's 1.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOXS vs. ZSL - Dividend Comparison
SOXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 64.90%, while ZSL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOXS Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares | 64.90% | 10.79% | 5.45% | 9.22% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 3.58% | 2.30% | 0.76% |
ZSL ProShares UltraShort Silver | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOXS and ZSL have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXS has higher volatility (44.74%) compared to ZSL (32.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOXS dropped -100.00% vs ZSL's -100.00%.
On 10-year performance, ZSL leads with -44.03% vs -78.81% for SOXS. On fees, SOXS is cheaper at 1.08% per year. On volatility, ZSL has been the lower-risk option at 32.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ZSL has performed better with a -44.03% return vs -78.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXS is cheaper with a 1.08% expense ratio, compared with 1.32% for ZSL.
SOXS has the higher dividend yield at 64.90%, compared with 0.00% for ZSL.
SOXS is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while ZSL is Silver. SOXS tracks PHLX Semiconductor Index (-300%), while ZSL tracks Bloomberg Silver Subindex (-2x). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for SOXS and 1.32% for ZSL.
ZSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.78 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOXS and ZSL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer