PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SOXQ vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SOXQ vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOXQ achieves a 72.20% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 9.14% return.


SOXQ

1D
6.53%
1M
-3.45%
6M
53.12%
YTD
72.20%
1Y
117.36%
3Y*
49.65%
5Y*
29.96%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
30.79%

SCHG

1D
1.89%
1M
4.10%
6M
13.23%
YTD
9.14%
1Y
18.46%
3Y*
24.14%
5Y*
13.74%
10Y*
18.56%
ALL TIME*
16.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$253.95M$251.67M$339.26M
$214.44M$218.73M$282.51M

SOXQ vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SOXQ
Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
72.20%43.11%20.16%66.74%-35.59%25.19%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
9.14%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%17.69%

Correlation

The correlation between SOXQ and SCHG is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2021

0.79

The correlation between SOXQ and SCHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SOXQ vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SOXQ
SCHG

Technology

99.9%
44.0%

Financial Services

0.1%
7.7%

Basic Materials

-

1.6%

Communication Services

-

14.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

11.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.9%

Energy

-

0.9%

Healthcare

-

9.9%

Industrials

-

7.6%

Real Estate

-

0.6%

Utilities

-

0.5%

Technology

SOXQ
99.9%
SCHG
44.0%

Financial Services

SOXQ
0.1%
SCHG
7.7%

Basic Materials

SOXQ

-

SCHG
1.6%

Communication Services

SOXQ

-

SCHG
14.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SOXQ

-

SCHG
11.2%

Consumer Defensive

SOXQ

-

SCHG
1.9%

Energy

SOXQ

-

SCHG
0.9%

Healthcare

SOXQ

-

SCHG
9.9%

Industrials

SOXQ

-

SCHG
7.6%

Real Estate

SOXQ

-

SCHG
0.6%

Utilities

SOXQ

-

SCHG
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SOXQ vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SOXQ
SOXQ Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
SOXQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOXQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOXQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SOXQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOXQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SOXQ vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SOXQSCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.20

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.13

1.13

+3.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.72

3.57

+13.15

SOXQ vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SOXQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SOXQ and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SOXQ vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOXQ drawdown since its inception was -46.01%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOXQ and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SOXQSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.01%

-34.59%

-11.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.56%

-16.41%

-12.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.36%

-23.39%

-15.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.01%

-34.59%

-11.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.72%

0.00%

-16.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.93%

-5.19%

-7.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.05%

5.19%

+1.86%

Volatility

SOXQ vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a higher volatility of 17.65% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 4.97%. This indicates that SOXQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SOXQSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.65%

4.97%

+12.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.94%

13.15%

+24.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.80%

16.72%

+27.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.40%

22.46%

+15.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.01%

21.61%

+16.40%

SOXQ vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SOXQ has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SOXQ vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

SOXQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than SCHG's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.37%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%
SOXQ
Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
0.30%0.50%0.68%0.87%1.36%0.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SOXQ and SCHG have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOXQ has higher volatility (17.65%) compared to SCHG (4.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOXQ dropped -46.01% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

On 5-year performance, SOXQ leads with 29.96% vs 13.74% for SCHG. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 4.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 29.96% return vs 13.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for SOXQ.

SCHG has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.30% for SOXQ.

SOXQ is categorized as Semiconductors, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. SOXQ tracks PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for SOXQ and 0.04% for SCHG.

SOXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SOXQ and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer